In a thrown-drugs case, the suppression hearing usually comes down to a few seconds of video: did the person stop before the object left his hand, or after? I’m Rocky Brancato, and before founding The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm, I taught officers the legal limits of arrest authority as a police academy instructor. I have since tried more than 150 jury trials to verdict. Our attorneys build every abandonment challenge around that sequence, matching the officer’s report against body camera footage frame by frame.

What Does “Abandonment” Mean When Police Find Drugs You Threw?

Abandonment means you gave up your privacy interest in an item by throwing it, dropping it, or leaving it behind, so police can pick it up and use it without a warrant. Florida courts apply one critical limit: the abandonment must be voluntary. An item you discard because police illegally seized you is treated as the product of that illegal seizure, and it can be suppressed.

The Florida Supreme Court drew this line in Hollinger v. State, 620 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 1993). The court explained that a person who flees from a show of police authority has not been seized, while a person who stays in place and submits has been seized. If a person submits to an illegal stop and then drops contraband, the evidence must be suppressed. The court added that police do not have to order a person to drop anything for the abandonment to be involuntary.

This matters most in drug possession cases, which our Tampa drug crimes attorney page covers in more detail, because a tossed baggie or pill bottle is often the only evidence the State has.

What Is the Difference Between “Drop Then Stop” and “Stop Then Drop”?

“Drop then stop” means you got rid of the item before you were seized, so it is voluntarily abandoned and admissible. “Stop then drop” means you had already submitted to police authority when you got rid of it, so the abandonment is involuntary if the stop was illegal. The legality of the officer’s order does not matter in a “drop then stop” case.

The U.S. Supreme Court set the federal rule in California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991). Hodari ran when he saw officers, and he tossed a rock of crack cocaine just before an officer tackled him. The State conceded the officer had no reasonable suspicion to stop him. The Court still held the cocaine admissible because a person is seized only by physical force or by submitting to a show of authority, and Hodari had done neither when he threw it.

Florida’s Fourth District applied that rule in Johnson v. State, 640 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). An officer told Johnson to stop. Johnson kept walking briskly, stepped onto a porch, threw something down, and only then turned toward the officer and said, “What, officer?” The State conceded the officers had no lawful reason to stop him. The court called it a very close case, but it upheld the trial judge’s finding that the drop came before the stop, so the evidence came in.

When Are You “Seized” by Police in Florida?

You are seized when an officer physically restrains you or when you submit to an officer’s show of authority, such as an order to stop. Submission does not require handcuffs or even a spoken command. Courts look at what you actually did in the seconds before the item left your hand.

Hollinger shows how little it can take. Masked Orange County deputies in SWAT-style gear pulled into a parking lot during a drug sweep, announced “Orange County Sheriff’s Office,” and approached a group. Hollinger put his hand behind his back and dropped a tissue holding six rocks of cocaine. No deputy told him to freeze. The trial judge found that a reasonable person would have felt he was not to move, and the Florida Supreme Court upheld the suppression.

In Lang v. State, 671 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), a deputy stopped Lang, who was walking at night with a flashlight in a high-crime area, without any reasonable basis. The deputy told Lang to step back to the patrol car, and Lang began to comply. When the deputy told him to take his hand out of his pocket, Lang threw a pill bottle behind him. The Fifth District held that Lang had submitted by starting to comply, so the abandonment was involuntary, and it reversed his conviction.

Compare State v. Canada, 715 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Officers asked Canada what was in his hand. Instead of showing them, he turned, threw a film container about 25 feet over a chain-link fence, and tried to run. Because Canada never yielded, the Fifth District held the abandonment voluntary and reversed the trial court’s suppression order.

When our attorneys evaluate a thrown-evidence case, we ask five questions:

1. Did an officer give an order or make a show of authority, such as lights, commands, or blocking your path?
2. Did you stop, turn toward the officer, raise your hands, or begin following an instruction?
3. Did the item leave your hand before or after that act of compliance?
4. Did you try to run after throwing it?
5. What does the video show, compared with what the arrest report says?

What Did the Fifth District Decide in Jeffries v. State (2026)?

The Fifth District held that a man who stopped and turned toward an officer before throwing a pill bottle had already submitted, so the abandonment was involuntary. The case is Jeffries v. State, No. 5D2024-1721 (Fla. 5th DCA July 31, 2026), and it is the newest Florida appellate decision applying the stop-then-drop rule.

Larry Sapp, an off-duty Clay County School District police officer, was home in Putnam County, outside his jurisdiction, when his daughter told him someone had tried to break into his patrol car. Sapp saw Jeffries leaving his property, identified himself as law enforcement, and ordered him to stop. Jeffries kept walking. Sapp later found him near an apartment complex and again ordered him to stop. This time Jeffries stopped and turned toward Sapp. As Sapp moved in to arrest him, Jeffries made a throwing motion. A responding officer found a pill bottle containing narcotics where the object landed, and a search of Jeffries turned up a stun gun.

The court applied Hollinger, Hodari D., and Johnson. It found that Jeffries had already complied with the second order to stop when he threw the bottle, which made the facts line up with Lang rather than Canada. The court noted that Jeffries had walked away the first time but stopped the second time, and the second stop is what mattered. Because the abandonment was involuntary, the pill bottle could not justify the search that found the stun gun as a lawful search incident to arrest.

The court reversed the order denying suppression, vacated Jeffries’s conviction for possession of an electric weapon or device by a convicted felon under section 790.23, Florida Statutes, and remanded. At the hearing, defense counsel had limited the motion to suppress to the stun gun count, so the opinion does not decide what happens to the drug possession counts.

Jeffries also held that the arrest itself was unlawful. An officer outside his jurisdiction has only a private citizen’s arrest powers, which reach only a felony or a breach of the peace committed in the citizen’s presence, and the court found Sapp saw neither. We cover that part of the case in our posts on disorderly conduct and breach of the peace and on whether an off-duty police officer can arrest you in Florida.

The evergreen lesson from Jeffries is simple. Stopping and turning toward an officer is submission, and anything thrown after that moment is suppressible if the stop or arrest was illegal.

Why Does the Legality of the Stop Decide Everything?

The legality of the stop decides the case because a stop-then-drop argument wins only when the seizure was illegal. If the officer had reasonable suspicion to detain you, the evidence comes in even though you had submitted before you threw it. Every abandonment motion therefore has two parts: when you were seized, and whether the officer had a lawful basis to seize you at that moment.

Under the Florida Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes, an officer may temporarily detain a person only when the circumstances reasonably indicate the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. The statute also bars evidence from a search under that section unless the search complied with the statute. Our post on whether police can stop and frisk you in Florida walks through what counts as reasonable suspicion.

A recent First District case shows why the defense must attack the stop directly. In Smith v. State, No. 1D2025-0497 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept. 23, 2026), Smith tried to keep officers from seeing a cellophane baggie in his hand, including by stomping on it after he dropped it, and the court counted those efforts among the facts supporting probable cause to search his vehicle. Smith also challenged his initial detention, but his brief argued only probable cause and never addressed reasonable suspicion, so the court held he had not shown the detention was unlawful and affirmed. The Second District, which hears appeals from Tampa Bay, treats cannabis odor differently than the First District did in Smith, as we explain in our post on whether police can search your car for smelling weed in Florida.

Can Throwing Drugs Add a Tampering With Evidence Charge?

Yes, throwing drugs can lead to a tampering charge, but tossing them in plain view does not automatically qualify. Under section 918.13, Florida Statutes, the State must prove you knew an investigation was pending or about to begin and that you altered, destroyed, concealed, or removed an item with the purpose of impairing its availability. Tampering is a third-degree felony, punishable by up to five years in prison.

In State v. Jennings, 666 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 1995), Jennings swallowed suspected cocaine rocks the moment an officer shouted “police!” The Florida Supreme Court held that swallowing an item can be tampering, and that throwing evidence away in an officer’s presence may also be tampering depending on the circumstances.

The Second District, whose decisions bind Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco courts, applied that rule in E.I. v. State, 25 So. 3d 625 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). During a traffic stop in Plant City, a passenger tossed a package of methamphetamine out the truck window at the driver’s direction, and it landed in plain view on a gas station parking lot. The court held this was abandonment, not attempted tampering, because nothing showed he intended to alter, destroy, or conceal the package, and it ordered him discharged. The court pointed to swallowing drugs or dropping them into a drainage outlet as the kind of acts aimed at destroying evidence.

Abandonment doctrine works at two stages of the same case. At the suppression hearing, the question is whether the toss was voluntary. At trial on a tampering count, the question is whether the toss was a plain abandonment or an act meant to destroy or hide the evidence. Losing the first argument does not end the second.

Is Running From Police a Separate Crime in Florida?

Running from police can be charged as resisting an officer without violence, a first-degree misdemeanor under section 843.02, Florida Statutes, punishable by up to one year in jail. The charge requires that the officer was lawfully executing a legal duty when you ran.

In C.E.L. v. State, 24 So. 3d 1181 (Fla. 2009), a juvenile ran when he saw deputies at an apartment complex known for drug activity, then kept running after they ordered him to stop. The Florida Supreme Court held that his unprovoked flight in a high-crime area gave the deputies reasonable suspicion, so his continued flight in defiance of their order was resisting without violence. The court also held that the person must know the officer intends to detain him, and the officer must be justified in making the stop when the resistance occurs.

Running rarely helps. Anything you throw while running is admissible under Hodari D., and if the officer had a lawful basis to stop you, the flight adds a separate charge. In Tampa Bay arrest paperwork, our attorneys routinely see a resisting count stacked on top of the charge that started the encounter, and in our Hillsborough County practice it is often the most winnable charge on the arrest affidavit. Our post on resisting an officer without violence in Florida explains those defenses.

What Charges Can Follow When Police Recover Thrown Evidence?

A thrown item usually produces a possession charge, and the throw itself can add tampering or resisting counts. Drug charges are a steady share of local arrests: in 2020, law enforcement in Hillsborough County reported 3,028 drug arrests out of 32,519 total arrests, according to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement’s 2020 county arrest data, the last year FDLE published county arrest totals in that format. That is about one of every eleven arrests in the county.

How Do Our Attorneys Challenge Thrown Evidence?

Our attorneys challenge thrown evidence by rebuilding the encounter second by second and filing a motion to suppress when the timeline shows a stop-then-drop on an illegal stop. The motion asks the judge to exclude the item and anything found because of it, as happened with the stun gun in Jeffries.

1. Pin down the sequence. We compare body camera and dash camera footage, dispatch audio, and the arrest report to fix the exact moment of the order, the moment of compliance, and the moment of the throw.
2. Test the basis for the stop. We identify what the officer knew before giving the order and whether it amounted to reasonable suspicion under section 901.151.
3. Challenge the officer’s account. Legal scholars have flagged “dropsy” testimony for decades. Law professor Christopher Slobogin, in Testilying: Police Perjury and What to Do About It, 67 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1037 (1996), describes data showing that police testimony that arrestees dropped drugs as officers approached increased after Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), the Supreme Court decision that applied the exclusionary rule to state police. Video now lets us test that kind of claim.
4. Follow the fruit. If the throw was involuntary, we move to suppress everything that flowed from it, including later searches of your person or car.
5. Defend the add-on counts. We attack tampering and resisting charges on their own elements, even if the suppression motion fails.

Our post on motions to suppress evidence in Tampa explains how these hearings work.

What Should You Do After an Arrest Involving Thrown Drugs?

Talk to a defense attorney before you talk to anyone else about the case, and do it quickly, because the evidence that proves the sequence can disappear. Private surveillance systems often record over old footage, and witnesses forget details.

• Do not explain to police, cellmates, or friends why you threw something. Those statements can be used against you.
• Write down, privately, the order of events: when the officer spoke, when you stopped, and when the item left your hand.
• Note any businesses, homes, or vehicles nearby that may have cameras, and anyone who saw the encounter.
• Do not post about the arrest on social media.
• If officers released you and said the item would be tested, charges can still be filed later. Our representation before charges are filed can begin now.

Frequently Asked Questions About Thrown Evidence in Florida

Can police use drugs I threw while running away from them?

Usually yes, because a person who is running has not been seized, so anything thrown during the chase is treated as voluntarily abandoned under Hodari D. and Canada. The Brancato Law Firm still examines whether you actually stopped, even briefly, before the throw, since that moment can change the outcome. Our stop and frisk guide explains when police can lawfully chase and detain you.

Is it tampering with evidence to throw drugs on the ground in front of an officer?

Not automatically, because Florida requires proof that you intended to destroy, conceal, or remove the item, and a toss in plain view that police easily recover can be plain abandonment under E.I. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm attack the intent element directly and use the recovery location and video to show nothing was hidden. Swallowing drugs or dropping them down a drain is treated more seriously under section 918.13.

Can thrown drug charges be dropped in Florida?

Yes, thrown drug charges can be dropped, most often when a judge suppresses the item and the State has no other evidence to prove possession. The Brancato Law Firm also evaluates diversion options, and Hillsborough County offers programs such as Pretrial Intervention and Drug Court that can result in dismissal. See our page on drug possession defense in Tampa for more.

What if I threw a gun when police approached me in Florida?

The same abandonment rules apply to a gun as to drugs, so a gun thrown before you were seized is admissible, while a gun thrown after you submitted to an illegal stop can be suppressed. For clients with a prior felony, The Brancato Law Firm treats the suppression issue as the center of the defense, because possession by a convicted felon under section 790.23 is a second-degree felony. Our Tampa gun crimes lawyer page explains those charges.

What if police let me go after I threw something and said they would test it?

You can still be charged later, because the State can file charges after lab results come back. The Brancato Law Firm can contact the prosecutor before a decision is made and preserve video while it still exists. Learn more about our pre-file advocacy work.

Does it matter if the officer was off duty or outside his jurisdiction?

Yes, because an officer outside his jurisdiction generally has only a private citizen’s arrest powers, and Jeffries shows an arrest outside those limits is unlawful. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm check where the officer was, whether he was on duty, and what he personally saw before the arrest. Read more in our post on whether an off-duty police officer can arrest you in Florida.

What if the police report says I dropped the drugs before I stopped?

The report is not the final word, because the judge decides the sequence at the suppression hearing from all the evidence, including video and your testimony. The Brancato Law Firm lines up the report against the footage and dispatch timeline to find gaps. Johnson shows how close these calls can be.

Thrown Evidence Cases Are Won on the Timeline

The first thing our attorneys do in a thrown-evidence case is lock down the timeline: the video, the dispatch audio, and the officer’s report, compared second by second before footage is lost or memories fade. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. was founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, and our attorneys defend drug, gun, and resisting charges in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties. Call (813) 727-7159 now, while the evidence that shows when you stopped still exists. For more about our defense strategies, visit our Drug Crimes page.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm. I spent years as a police academy instructor teaching officers how to apply Florida statutes in the field, and I later served as COO of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office, overseeing a staff of over 100. Today our attorneys defend people charged with crimes in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties, including business owners who find themselves in a criminal investigation over what is really a payment dispute.

What does Florida’s mover statute, section 507.11, make a crime?

Section 507.11(1), Florida Statutes, makes it a third-degree felony for a mover, or a mover’s employee, agent, or contractor, to refuse a law enforcement officer’s order to release a customer’s household goods. The order only triggers the felony if the officer first makes one of two specific determinations. A third-degree felony in Florida carries up to five years in prison and a $5,000 fine under section 775.082 and section 775.083.

The statute calls the customer the “shipper.” Here is what the State would have to establish:

Every other violation of Chapter 507 is a first-degree misdemeanor under section 507.11(2), punishable by up to one year in jail and a $1,000 fine. That catch-all covers registration, estimate, and disclosure failures.

When can a Florida mover legally hold a customer’s belongings?

A Florida mover can hold household goods when the customer has not paid the amount specified in a written contract or estimate that the customer signed and dated. Section 507.06(1) requires a mover to deliver and place goods inside the customer’s home “unless the shipper has not tendered payment in the amount specified in a written contract or estimate signed and dated by the shipper.”

Three limits apply even when the mover is owed money:

• Medicine and children’s items. A mover “may not refuse to relinquish prescription medicines and goods for use by children, including children’s furniture, clothing, or toys, under any circumstances.”
• Payment refusal. Under section 507.06(2), a mover cannot withhold goods because it refused a form of payment it was required to accept. Section 507.05 requires every mover to accept at least two of three payment types (cash-type payment, personal check, or credit card) and to disclose which ones on the estimate and contract.
• Storage disclosure. A mover that lawfully withholds goods may store them until payment is tendered. Under section 507.06(3), the mover must disclose the storage location and the amount due within five days of a written request.

An officer arriving at the scene sees a customer standing next to a truck full of their own furniture. The statute requires the officer to look past that picture and read the paperwork.

Does a signed revised estimate change what the customer owes?

Yes. Since July 1, 2024, section 507.11(1) expressly counts “amendments to the contract for services reflecting the price adjustment signed by the shipper” when deciding whether the customer has paid. The Legislature added that language, along with electronic acknowledgment, in Senate Bill 304 (2024), which became Chapter 2024-47, Laws of Florida.

The practical effect is clear. A customer who agrees in writing to a higher price, before the work is done, owes the higher price. Paying only the original phone quote does not satisfy section 507.11(1), and an officer who treats the original quote as the controlling number is ignoring the amendment language the Legislature added in 2024.

When does holding goods cross the line into a crime or a lawsuit?

Holding goods becomes unlawful when the mover inflates the price without a valid signed agreement, or keeps goods after the customer has paid what the signed documents require. Section 507.07 lists the violations. These include misrepresenting the price of moving services, failing to honor the contract for services, and withholding goods “if payment has been made as delineated in the estimate or contract for services.” Under section 507.08, any violation of Chapter 507 is also a deceptive and unfair trade practice under Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA).

The classic bait-and-switch shows the difference. In Thompson Nation Holdings LLC v. Gonzalez, No. 3D2024-0588 (Fla. 3d DCA Sept. 10, 2025), a student hired movers to take her belongings from Miami to Gainesville on a $1,146 binding estimate that promised no additional charges unless specified or requested. At the destination, the movers presented a $4,389.25 invoice, refused to unload when she offered the estimate amount, and left with her belongings while she went inside to call police. The bill of lading she signed that morning had blank rate lines that were filled in by hand later. The Third District affirmed summary judgment for the customer, including the trial court’s findings of FDUTPA violations, fraud, and breach of contract. The lesson for movers is simple: a price increase the customer never signed is worth nothing, and a document filled in after the fact can make things worse.

I have been on the customer’s side of this myself. A mover once quoted me a price, never prepared a change order, raised the price when the crew arrived, and held my belongings until I paid. The next day I called the company, demanded a refund of the difference, and told them I would sue. They refunded it. I am a lawyer, and I suspect that is the main reason it worked. Shady movers rely on intimidation and on customers not knowing the law. Chapter 507 exists for that situation. A mover who discloses a higher price up front and gets the customer’s signature before lifting a box stands in a very different position.

Federal investigators have tracked the same problem for years. A 2009 Government Accountability Office report on the household goods moving industry, GAO-10-38, noted that some consumer complaints to federal regulators “involve egregious offenses, such as holding goods hostage.” In 2024, Florida’s Senate staff counted 1,348 movers and 39 moving brokers with active Florida registrations as of December 4, 2023, according to the Senate Fiscal Policy Committee’s bill analysis of SB 304.

Can a mover be charged with resisting an officer instead?

An officer could try. Resisting an officer without violence under section 843.02 is a first-degree misdemeanor. In C.E.L. v. State, 24 So. 3d 1181 (Fla. 2009), the Florida Supreme Court reviewed a juvenile’s conviction for running from police and held that the State must prove two things: the officer was engaged in the lawful execution of a legal duty, and the accused’s words or conduct obstructed or resisted that duty.

That first element matters for movers. An order to release goods that section 507.11 does not authorize is hard to describe as the lawful execution of a legal duty. Our attorneys would raise that argument on a resisting charge. A mover who physically interferes with an officer, however, risks charges that are much harder to defend, so save every argument about the order for court.

How often are movers actually prosecuted under section 507.11?

Felony prosecutions under section 507.11 appear to be rare. When the Legislature’s Criminal Justice Impact Conference reviewed a 2015 bill to expand the statute, the Department of Corrections reported that zero offenders were sentenced under section 507.11(1) in fiscal year 2013-14, according to the Office of Economic and Demographic Research’s impact estimate for HB 765. That figure is more than a decade old, and the 2024 amendments may change enforcement patterns. As of October 2026, our research found no published Florida appellate decision interpreting section 507.11’s officer-determination language, which helps explain why officers in the field read it inconsistently.

Arrests can still happen. An arrest happens on the officer’s judgment at the scene. Whether formal charges follow is a separate decision made later by the State Attorney’s Office.

What should a mover do when police demand the goods be released?

A mover facing an officer’s release order should stay calm, show the signed documents, and decide deliberately whether to comply under protest or hold the goods. Here is the approach our firm recommends:

1. Produce the paperwork immediately. Show the original estimate, the signed revised estimate, the contract for services, and the electronic signature record with its time stamp, email address, and IP address.
2. Point the officer to the two triggers. Explain that the customer has not paid the signed amended amount and that a signed binding estimate is in hand, so neither condition in section 507.11(1) is met.
3. Release medicine and children’s items right away. Section 507.06(1) allows no exception for these.
4. Offer to accept payment. Confirm the payment forms disclosed on the estimate and that you will take them.
5. Do not physically resist. Never block, push, or pull away from an officer.
6. Call a criminal defense attorney. A Hillsborough County criminal defense attorney can speak to the officer or a supervisor while the facts are fresh.

The decision to comply or hold is a business judgment with real tradeoffs:

An arrest made without probable cause can support a federal civil rights claim. Officers, however, can raise qualified immunity, which in the Eleventh Circuit protects an officer who had “arguable” probable cause. A civil case after an arrest is slow and uncertain.

What does a revised estimate need to hold up?

A revised estimate holds up best when it meets every requirement in section 507.05 and is signed before any work begins. Use this checklist:

• Prepared by a mover registered with the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
• Signed or electronically acknowledged, and dated, by the customer and the mover (and any broker)
• Shows the original amount, the revised total, and the reason for the change, such as the actual item count or volume
• Includes an itemized breakdown of loading, transportation, unloading, and accessorial charges
• Discloses accepted payment forms and the storage location in case of a fee dispute
• Signed before loading, with the time stamp preserved

Chapter 507 applies only to moves that begin and end in Florida, under section 507.02. Interstate moves are governed by federal rules. Under 49 C.F.R. section 375.403, an interstate mover that finds additional goods must, before loading, reaffirm its binding estimate, prepare a new binding estimate signed by the customer that lists the added goods in detail, or agree in writing to treat the original estimate as non-binding. Florida law has no identical rule, but following the federal model gives an intrastate mover strong evidence that the revision was fair and agreed.

What happens if a mover is arrested in Tampa Bay?

A mover arrested in Hillsborough, Pinellas, or Pasco County who is not released on a bond schedule will see a judge at first appearance within 24 hours, where bond and release conditions are set. The State Attorney’s Office then decides whether to file formal charges, and the customer does not control that decision. Our related post on whether a victim can drop charges in Florida explains how that filing decision works.

The weeks between arrest and the filing decision are the best time to act. Our attorneys use that window for pre-file advocacy: sending prosecutors the signed revised estimate, the electronic signature audit trail, photos or video of the load, and a written analysis of sections 507.06 and 507.11. A prosecutor who sees a signed, time-stamped price amendment has good reason to decline the case. Save every document, text, and photo from the job, and avoid giving a statement to police without counsel. Our post on the Florida accident report privilege explains how statements to police can be used later, and our guide to what a criminal defense attorney costs in Tampa covers fees.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Hillsborough County criminal defense attorney page.

Frequently asked questions

Can a Florida mover keep my furniture if I only paid the phone estimate?

Yes, if you later signed and dated a revised estimate with a higher price and have not paid it. Section 507.06(1) lets a mover withhold goods until the customer tenders the amount in a signed written estimate or contract. Prescription medicines and children’s items must still be released.

Is it legal for a mover to raise the price on moving day in Florida?

A price increase is enforceable when it is put in writing and signed or electronically acknowledged by the customer before the work is done. An increase the customer never agreed to can violate section 507.07 and FDUTPA, as the movers in Thompson Nation Holdings LLC v. Gonzalez, No. 3D2024-0588 (Fla. 3d DCA Sept. 10, 2025) learned. Our firm tells movers to get the signature before loading.

Does a mover’s electronic signature record count as proof in Florida?

Yes. Since July 1, 2024, section 507.11(1) refers to a “signed or electronically acknowledged” binding estimate, and section 507.05 allows the shipper and mover to electronically acknowledge the estimate and contract. A record showing the time stamp, email address, and IP address is strong evidence the customer agreed.

If a mover releases goods to police, does it lose the right to collect?

No. Section 507.11(1) states that complying with an officer’s order “is not a waiver or finding of fact regarding any right to seek further payment from the shipper.” The mover can still pursue the balance in civil court. The Brancato Law Firm’s practice is criminal defense, so we focus on the arrest risk side of that choice.

Can a moving crew member be arrested, or only the company owner?

Both. Section 507.11(1) applies to “a mover or a mover’s employee, agent, or contractor,” so a driver who refuses an officer’s order can face the same charge as the owner. Crew members should call the owner and a lawyer before deciding how to respond.

What should I do if police threaten to arrest me over a moving payment dispute in Tampa?

Show the signed documents, release medicine and children’s items, do not physically resist, and call a criminal defense attorney. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. can review your estimate and contract, talk to the officer, and defend you if an arrest happens. Call (813) 727-7159.

Talk to a Tampa criminal defense attorney today

If an officer has threatened to arrest you over a moving job, or you have already been arrested, the attorneys of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, can help. Call (813) 727-7159 now, before the State Attorney’s Office makes its filing decision.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm. I taught search and seizure to police officers at the police academy — the same rules discussed on this page — and today our attorneys use that insider’s understanding of how stops and frisks are supposed to work to challenge the ones that don’t.

What Is Florida’s Stop and Frisk Law?

Florida’s Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes, is the state’s codified version of the rule from Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) — the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that first allowed officers to briefly detain and pat down a suspect on less than probable cause. The Florida statute authorizes an officer to temporarily detain any person “under circumstances which reasonably indicate that such person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit” a crime, for the limited purpose of identifying the person and learning the circumstances that aroused the officer’s suspicion.

The statute then draws boundaries that many street encounters blow straight through. The detention may last no longer than reasonably necessary to accomplish that limited purpose, and it may not extend beyond the place where it began or its immediate vicinity. If probable cause to arrest develops, the officer must arrest; if it does not, the officer must let the person go. Every one of those requirements is a potential defense issue, because the statute’s final subsection is a weapon our attorneys use regularly: no evidence seized in a search under the statute is admissible in any Florida court unless the stop and the search complied with the statute’s own rules.

What Does the State Need to Stop You? (Less Than You Think)

The legal standard for the stop itself is reasonable suspicion — specific, articulable facts suggesting criminal activity, judged by the totality of the circumstances. It is far less than probable cause, and far less than proof. But it must be more than a hunch, a feeling, or your mere presence in the “wrong” neighborhood.

Here is a quirk of the statute that surprises even lawyers: section 901.151 uses the words “probable cause” in its frisk provision, but Florida courts have held that in this statute the term actually means reasonable belief or suspicion — the point was repeated just weeks ago in State v. Lyles, No. 3D24-1602 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 5, 2026), a decision we discuss in detail below.

Florida courts judging reasonable suspicion look at the whole picture. In Cook v. State, No. 4D2025-1960 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 5, 2026), decided the same day as Lyles, the Fourth District repeated the factors courts weigh: the time; the day of the week; the location; the physical appearance of the suspect; the behavior of the suspect; the appearance and manner of operation of any vehicle involved; and anything incongruous or unusual in the situation as interpreted in light of the officer’s experience.

When Can Police Frisk You? The Stop Is Not Enough

A lawful stop does not automatically authorize a frisk — this is the single most misunderstood point in Florida stop-and-frisk law. Under section 901.151(5), the officer must separately have a reasonable belief that you are armed with a dangerous weapon and therefore pose a threat to the officer or someone else, and even then may search “only to the extent necessary to disclose, and for the purpose of disclosing,” the weapon.

Florida courts distill this into three conditions, each of which the State must satisfy: the detention itself must be lawful; the officer must have a reasonable suspicion that the person is armed; and the pat-down must be strictly limited to finding the weapon. The suspicion that you are armed must rest on some objective basis — courts point to things like aggressive behavior, furtive movements, or a visible bulge in the clothing — and not simply on whatever justified the stop in the first place. A frisk that fails any of the three conditions is unlawful, and what it turns up is subject to suppression under the statute’s exclusionary rule.

What Does the Lyles Decision Mean for Gun Cases?

In State v. Lyles, No. 3D24-1602 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 5, 2026), officers responding to a shots-fired report had a fairly detailed BOLO — a “be on the lookout” description — of the suspect. A detective spotted Lyles, who matched the description, and when they made eye contact the detective saw a bulge at Lyles’s waistband and watched him move his hand to adjust it. The detective stopped him and lifted his shirt, revealing a firearm. The trial court suppressed the gun, reasoning in part that the stop and the search happened simultaneously and that the detective never articulated safety concerns.

The Third District reversed. The court held that the totality of the circumstances — a BOLO for a shooting suspect, the matching description, the bulge, and the hand movement toward it — gave the detective reasonable suspicion that Lyles was armed and dangerous, and that nothing in the law forbids the stop and the protective search from happening at the same moment.

The evergreen lessons cut both ways, and our attorneys use each of them. For the State, Lyles confirms that a bulge plus a furtive adjustment, in the context of a shots-fired BOLO, will usually justify a frisk. For the defense, the decision reaffirms the framework that decides these cases: the frisk requires its own objective justification, distinct from the stop. When there is no bulge, no furtive movement, no report of a weapon — just an officer’s routine habit of patting down everyone he stops — the framework Lyles applied is the roadmap to suppression. In the permitless-carry era, when carrying a firearm is often perfectly legal, these stop-and-frisk boundaries have become the central battleground in Tampa Bay gun prosecutions — we cover the substantive gun charges in our guide to Florida’s gun crime laws.

Is Running From the Police a Crime in Florida?

It can be — and the answer traces to one of the most consequential Florida Supreme Court decisions of the modern era. In C.E.L. v. State, 24 So. 3d 1181 (Fla. 2009), a teenager standing in the common area of an apartment complex in a high-crime area took off running the moment officers approached, then kept running after they ordered him to stop. The Florida Supreme Court held that unprovoked, headlong flight from police in a high-crime area itself creates the reasonable suspicion that justifies a stop — and that once the officers’ command to stop was therefore lawful, the continued flight in defiance of it constituted the crime of resisting an officer without violence under section 843.02, Florida Statutes.

The rule has hard edges worth knowing. Mere presence in a high-crime area is not reasonable suspicion, and as a general rule flight alone, without more, does not support a resisting charge — it is the combination of unprovoked flight plus the high-crime setting that changes the analysis. Whether the area actually qualifies as “high-crime,” whether the flight was truly unprovoked, and whether the officer’s command came before or after the legal justification arose are all litigable questions, and they decide real cases. We break down the resisting charge itself in our guide to resisting an officer without violence in Florida.

What Are Your Rights During a Stop and Frisk?

You have more rights during a street stop than most people exercise — and fewer than internet folklore suggests. You are not required to answer questions beyond basic identification during a lawful stop, and you never have to consent to a search: a frisk imposed over your objection must stand on the officer’s own reasonable suspicion that you are armed, or its fruits are suppressible. What you cannot lawfully do is physically resist, run from a lawful command to stop, or give a false name — each of those converts a bad stop into a real charge.

The most valuable thing you can do during a questionable stop is preserve the record rather than win the argument. Note the time and place, what the officer said, what you were doing, and who saw it. The legality of the stop will be decided later, in a courtroom, on a motion to suppress — not on the sidewalk. And because section 901.151(6) makes compliance with the statute a condition of admissibility, the details you remember often become the suppression motion our attorneys file.

How Do We Challenge an Unlawful Stop or Frisk?

We attack the stop and the frisk as separate events, because the law treats them separately. First, the stop: what specific facts did the officer possess before the detention began? Reasonable suspicion is measured only by what the officer knew at that moment — facts learned afterward cannot rescue a bad stop. Second, the frisk: what objective basis suggested you were armed — and if the honest answer is “nothing beyond the stop itself,” the three-condition framework applied in Lyles points toward suppression. Third, the scope: a pat-down that wanders beyond a search for weapons into pockets, bags, or containers has left its legal authority behind.

I taught officers exactly where these lines sit, and our attorneys read every report and every second of body-worn camera footage against that training. In Lyles itself, the body camera showed no visible bulge — the case turned on what the detective testified he saw. Those disputes are where suppression motions are won and lost, and they are why the earliest weeks of a case, while video and witnesses are still available, matter most.

What Should You Do If a Stop and Frisk Led to Charges?

Say nothing about what was found — not whose it is, not why it was there — because possession cases are built on statements far more often than on fingerprints. Then get the stop reviewed quickly. Body-worn camera footage, surveillance video from nearby businesses, dispatch and BOLO records, and CAD logs establishing exactly what the officer knew and when are the raw material of a suppression motion, and they are freshest — and sometimes only preserved — in the first weeks after an arrest. Under the statute’s exclusionary rule, a stop or frisk that violated section 901.151 means the evidence it produced cannot be used against you, and in a possession case that is usually the whole prosecution.

Frequently Asked Questions About Stop and Frisk in Florida

Can police stop me for no reason in Florida?

No. An investigatory detention requires reasonable suspicion — specific facts reasonably indicating you have committed, are committing, or are about to commit a crime, under section 901.151, Florida Statutes. Officers may always attempt a consensual encounter and ask questions, but unless the encounter ripens into a lawful stop, you are free to decline and walk away. Our attorneys review body camera and dispatch records in every case to pin down which kind of encounter it really was.

Do I have to answer police questions during a stop?

Beyond identifying yourself during a lawful stop, you are not required to answer investigative questions, and declining to answer is not a crime. Anything you volunteer, however, can supply the probable cause that turns a detention into an arrest. The safer course is polite silence and an early call to a defense lawyer.

Can police search my pockets during a frisk?

Not as a general search. Section 901.151(5) limits the frisk to what is necessary to find a dangerous weapon — an outer-clothing pat-down, extended only as needed to disclose the weapon. A frisk that becomes a hunt through your pockets for drugs or other evidence exceeds the statute, and what it finds is subject to suppression under section 901.151(6).

Is it illegal to run from the police in Florida?

It can be. Under C.E.L. v. State, 24 So. 3d 1181 (Fla. 2009), unprovoked flight from officers in a high-crime area creates reasonable suspicion for a stop, and continuing to flee after a lawful command to stop is resisting an officer without violence — a first-degree misdemeanor. Whether the area was truly “high-crime” and whether the command was lawful are contested questions our attorneys litigate.

I was carrying my gun legally — can police still frisk me?

The sight of a firearm is no longer automatic evidence of a crime in Florida’s permitless-carry era, which is precisely why the frisk rules matter more than ever. The officer still needs reasonable suspicion of criminal activity for the stop and a reasonable belief you pose a danger for the frisk. If a lawful carry led to charges anyway, The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. examines both the stop and the charging decision — start with our guide to Florida’s gun crime laws.

Can evidence from an illegal stop and frisk be thrown out?

Yes — Florida’s Stop and Frisk Law contains its own exclusionary rule. Section 901.151(6) makes evidence from a search inadmissible unless both the detention and the search complied with the statute. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. builds suppression motions on exactly that provision; call (813) 727-7159 for a free review of how your stop actually happened.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Hillsborough County Criminal Defense Attorney page.

Related reading: What Are the Gun Crime Laws in Florida? · What Is Resisting an Officer Without Violence in Florida? · Florida’s Second DCA Limits the “Plain Smell” Cannabis Search Doctrine · What to Do After Being Arrested in Tampa, Florida

The Stop Decided Your Case Before You Ever Saw a Courtroom

If a street stop, a pat-down, or a “routine” detention in Hillsborough, Pinellas, or Pasco County produced the evidence against you, the lawfulness of those first ninety seconds may decide everything that follows. Call the attorneys of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. — founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, who taught these rules at the police academy — at (813) 727-7159 before the body camera footage and dispatch records that can prove your stop was unlawful disappear into routine retention purges.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm. I taught criminal procedure at the police academy, so I know exactly what officers are trained to write in a resisting report — and our attorneys use that training every week to take these charges apart.

What Does the State Have to Prove for Resisting Without Violence?

Two things — and both are genuinely contestable. Under Section 843.02, Florida Statutes, and as the Florida Supreme Court framed it in C.E.L. v. State, 24 So. 3d 1181 (Fla. 2009), the State must prove: (1) the officer was engaged in the lawful execution of a legal duty; and (2) the defendant’s action — by words, conduct, or a combination — constituted obstruction or resistance of that lawful duty.

Both elements have teeth. If the stop or detention wasn’t lawful at the moment the alleged resistance happened, element one fails — and that fight doesn’t end if a pretrial motion to suppress is denied, because the lawfulness of the officer’s duty is an element the State must still prove at trial. Losing the suppression motion means the jury hears the evidence; it does not take the defense away. And not everything that annoys an officer is “obstruction” — element two requires actual resistance, not confusion, fear, or a few seconds of hesitation. Our attorneys attack both in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco County courtrooms:

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. — Tampa criminal defense — (813) 727-7159

What Are the Penalties for Resisting Without Violence?

Up to one year in jail, twelve months of probation, and a fine — because it is a first-degree misdemeanor. That’s the same maximum as a battery or possession of 20 grams or less of cannabis, for conduct that is often nothing more than a chaotic few seconds during someone else’s bad night. A conviction also puts a “resisting” offense on a permanent record that employers and licensing boards read as fighting with police — which is exactly why we fight these charges instead of pleading them out by default. And the felony version is always lurking: resisting an officer with violence is a felony, and prosecutors sometimes charge up first and negotiate down later.

What Is the Difference Between Resisting With and Without Violence?

Violence toward the officer — and it is the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony. Under Section 843.01, Florida Statutes, whoever knowingly and willfully resists an officer “by offering or doing violence to the person of such officer” commits a felony of the third degree — up to five years in prison. Without violence, the same resistance is the first-degree misdemeanor discussed in this article.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. — (813) 727-7159

The line between the two is contested in real cases constantly: tensing an arm, pulling away, or stumbling during a chaotic arrest gets written up as “violence” in reports more often than you would think. When our attorneys see a felony resisting charge, the first fight is usually over that word — because reducing § 843.01 to § 843.02 takes a felony off the table entirely.

Why Do Resisting Charges Get Added to Other Charges?

September 2026 update: Resisting without violence is most often paired with disorderly conduct, and the two charges frequently fail together: if the underlying disorderly conduct arrest was unlawful because the officer saw only protected speech or did not witness the conduct, the officer was not engaged in the lawful execution of a legal duty. Our fully rewritten guide, Is Disorderly Conduct a Crime in Florida, and Can You Be Arrested Just for Yelling?, covers the Second District’s Barry v. State decision and the 2024–2026 cases on arrests made outside the officer’s presence.

Because resisting is the easiest charge to write — it requires no victim, no property, and no evidence beyond the officer’s own account of the encounter. In Tampa Bay arrest paperwork, we routinely see it stacked on top of the charge that started the encounter, and sometimes it is the only charge left standing when the original suspicion fizzles: the search comes up empty or the battery call falls apart, but the arrest still happened, so the report says the person “resisted.”

That pattern is also where the defense leverage lives. A resisting count that depends entirely on an unlawful stop collapses with the stop. A count built on a few chaotic seconds collapses against the video. And stacked counts collapse under the double jeopardy rule discussed below. Our firm treats an add-on resisting charge as a signal to scrutinize the whole encounter — because if the resisting count is weak, the rest of the report deserves the same skepticism.

What Counts as Resisting an Officer Without Violence?

Real obstruction of a lawful police duty — classic examples include refusing lawful commands during a valid stop, physically pulling away from a lawful arrest, or giving false identifying information during a lawful detention.

Running from the police can qualify too, and the leading case is worth knowing. In C.E.L. v. State, 24 So. 3d 1181 (Fla. 2009), a teenager in a high-crime area took off running the moment he saw officers, and kept running after they ordered him to stop. The Florida Supreme Court held that his flight was resisting without violence — because his own unprovoked, headlong flight in that setting gave the officers reasonable suspicion to stop him, which made their order to stop a lawful command he then defied. But C.E.L. cuts both ways, and it sets two limits the State must satisfy: the person must know the officer intends to detain them, and the officer must be legally justified in the stop at the moment the command is given. Walking away from an officer who has no lawful basis to detain you is not a crime.

Notice what all of those examples share: a lawful police command plus a real act of defiance. In our experience reviewing Tampa Bay arrest reports, plenty of resisting charges are missing one or both — the “command” was never lawful, or the “resistance” was a scared person freezing.

When Is It NOT Resisting? A 13-Year-Old’s Case Was Just Thrown Out

Hesitating for a few seconds is not a crime — a Florida appellate court said so this month. In E.Y., a Child v. State, No. 4D2025-2551 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 19, 2026), officers responding to a call about a girl suspected of battering her mother approached a 13-year-old, and an officer yelled “come here!” The child, within a few seconds, stopped walking and started crying. The appellate court held she was entitled to a judgment of dismissal on the resisting charge — because a momentary pause followed by compliance is not obstruction of a legal duty.

That case is worth sitting with, because it is how these charges actually happen: a tense scene, a shouted command, a frightened kid or adult who doesn’t respond instantly, and a charge that treats fear as defiance. When our attorneys defend a resisting case, the first question is always the same — what exactly did our client do, second by second? The answer, surprisingly often, is: nothing the law recognizes as resistance.

Can You Legally Resist an Unlawful Arrest in Florida?

Yes — as long as you use no force or violence at all. This surprises almost everyone, but it has been Florida law for generations: as the Second District — the appellate court for Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties — put it in Lobb v. State, No. 2D18-4137 (Fla. 2d DCA Jan. 31, 2020), “[i]f an arrest is not lawful, then a defendant cannot be guilty of resisting it . . . the common law rule still remains that a person may lawfully resist an illegal arrest without using any force or violence.” In Lobb itself, the court threw out a resisting conviction because the deputy had no lawful basis to detain the defendant in the first place.

The flip side is just as absolute: you may never use force. Under Section 776.051(1), Florida Statutes, a person is not justified in using or threatening force to resist an arrest or detention by a law enforcement officer — even one that turns out to be unlawful. The moment resistance becomes physical force against the officer, the legality of the arrest stops being a defense to that force, and a felony charge is on the table.

Our attorneys give every client the same practical advice: this is a courtroom right, not a street tactic. Comply calmly, say nothing about the incident, and let us litigate the lawfulness of the arrest afterward — where the right actually wins cases, the way it did in Lobb.

Can You Be Charged With Resisting Twice for One Incident?

Not when the resistance was one continuous act — even if several officers were involved. In K.B., a Child v. State, No. 5D2025-1370 (Fla. 5th DCA Aug. 21, 2026), a student resisted two school officers trying to take her vape device, kept resisting after being handcuffed, and was charged with two counts of resisting — one per officer. The Fifth District reversed one of them: her “continuing resistance to an arrest can amount to a single act of resistance, even if several officers are involved in the effort,” and charging it twice violated double jeopardy.

The court applied a five-factor test to decide whether resistance is one act or several:

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. — (813) 727-7159

In K.B., the location stayed the same, nothing intervened, and the child’s intent never changed — so it was one act, charged once. The court also confirmed that a double jeopardy violation is fundamental error, meaning it can be raised for the first time on appeal. When our firm reviews a case with stacked resisting counts — and multiple counts are common whenever several officers respond — this test is the first thing we run.

How Our Attorneys Defend a Resisting Without Violence Charge

By litigating it like the constitutional case it usually is, not the throwaway misdemeanor it looks like. The pattern that wins these cases:

1. Reconstruct the encounter second by second. Body camera, dash camera, school and business surveillance, and witness phones — matched against the report’s timeline. The E.Y. case turned on a few seconds.
2. Test the lawfulness of the duty. Was there reasonable suspicion for the stop, a lawful basis for the detention, a valid arrest? If not, element one fails — and a motion to suppress or dismiss follows.
3. Isolate the actual “act” of resistance. Fear, hesitation, questions, and reflexive movement are not obstruction. We make the State name the act — precisely — and then measure it against the video.
4. Run the double jeopardy test on stacked counts. One continuous episode is one charge, no matter how many officers responded.
5. Protect the record. Where the case resolves, we fight for outcomes that preserve eligibility to seal the record — because “resisting an officer” is a phrase no background check reads charitably.

That last point matters beyond the courtroom: a resisting case handled well ends quietly, and one handled carelessly follows a client for decades. It is also why these cases deserve real defense attention even though they are “only” misdemeanors — in our Hillsborough County practice, the resisting count is often the most winnable charge on the arrest affidavit.

What Should You Do After a Resisting Arrest in Tampa Bay?

Say nothing about the incident, and get the paper fast. Three things matter in the first days:

1. Don’t explain yourself to anyone but your lawyer. “I only pulled away because…” is a confession to element two.
2. Preserve the video. Body cameras, school cameras, and bystander phones decide these cases — the E.Y. facts were won on what actually happened, second by second. Video gets overwritten; preservation letters need to go out early.
3. Have counsel test both elements before any plea. Whether the stop was lawful and whether the conduct was truly resistance are legal questions — the kind our attorneys resolve in motions, not at sentencing.

Call The Brancato Law Firm at (813) 727-7159 — our attorneys answer 24/7.

Frequently Asked Questions: Resisting Without Violence in Florida

Is resisting an officer without violence a felony in Florida?

No — it is a first-degree misdemeanor under § 843.02, Fla. Stat., punishable by up to a year in jail. Resisting an officer with violence is a separate felony offense. In our Tampa Bay cases, we regularly see the line between the two contested — and it matters enormously.

Can I be convicted of resisting if the stop was illegal?

Generally no — the State must prove the officer was in the lawful execution of a legal duty when the alleged resistance occurred. But timing matters: under C.E.L. v. State, flight itself can sometimes create the suspicion that makes a later command lawful. Our attorneys analyze the lawfulness of the encounter moment by moment.

Is running from the police a crime in Florida?

It can be — defying a lawful order to stop is resisting without violence, and unprovoked flight in a high-crime area can itself justify the stop under C.E.L. v. State, 24 So. 3d 1181 (Fla. 2009). But the person must know the officer intends to detain them, and the order must be lawful when given.

Can a resisting without violence charge be dropped?

Yes — these charges get dismissed or reduced regularly, especially where the stop was unlawful, the “resistance” was momentary hesitation, or counts were stacked from a single episode. The Brancato Law Firm challenges both elements and, where the record supports it, moves for dismissal before trial.

My child was arrested at school for resisting — what happens now?

The case goes to juvenile delinquency court, and the recent appellate decisions in E.Y. and K.B. — both juvenile cases — show how vulnerable these charges are to challenge. In our juvenile cases, we also work to keep school-based incidents from becoming lasting records.

Can a resisting without violence case be sealed in Florida?

Often, yes — the outcome of the case controls eligibility, which is exactly why the resolution matters as much as the verdict. A dismissal, a dropped charge, or in many cases a withhold of adjudication can preserve the ability to seal or expunge the record, while a conviction generally cannot. Our firm handles record sealing and expungement, and we negotiate resisting cases with that endgame in view from day one.

Do I need a lawyer for a misdemeanor resisting charge?

Yes — a resisting conviction reads like “fought with police” to every future employer, landlord, and licensing board, and the charge is often the most defensible count on the arrest report. The attorneys of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. handle these cases throughout Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties. Call (813) 727-7159 for a free, confidential consultation.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Hillsborough County Criminal Defense page.

Related reading: Teen Takeover Arrests in Tampa Bay: What Every Parent Needs to Know · What to Do After Being Arrested in Tampa, Florida · How Does a Bond Hearing Work in Tampa? · The Criminal Court Process in Hillsborough County

Charged With Resisting in Tampa Bay? The Video Won’t Wait

Body camera and surveillance footage — the evidence that wins these cases — starts disappearing within weeks of an arrest. If you or your child is facing a resisting charge in Hillsborough, Pinellas, or Pasco County, call the attorneys of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. — founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato — at (813) 727-7159 before the recordings are gone.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. 620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 727-7159 Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.