I’m Tampa criminal defense attorney Rocky Brancato. With more than 25 years defending criminal cases in Hillsborough County, an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell, Super Lawyers recognition, and more than 150 jury trials to verdict, I bring the experience that felony UPL charges demand.

How Does Florida Define Unlicensed Practice of Law?

Under §454.23, three categories of conduct constitute UPL. The first is actually practicing law without a license or authorization. The second is holding yourself out to the public as qualified to practice law. The third is willfully using any name, title, or description that implies you are qualified or recognized by law as qualified to practice. Each of these categories is independently sufficient to support a felony charge.

Florida Statute §454.23: UPL in Florida is a third-degree felony — not a misdemeanor. The legislature upgraded this from a first-degree misdemeanor in 2004, reflecting the legislature’s recognition that unauthorized legal practice causes serious harm to the public. The felony classification means a conviction carries up to 5 years in prison, 5 years of probation, and a $5,000 fine. At The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., we defend individuals charged with UPL throughout the 13th Judicial Circuit.

The Florida Supreme Court defines the “practice of law” broadly. It includes giving legal advice, preparing legal documents, representing others in legal proceedings, and any activity that requires legal knowledge and skill. However, the exact boundary between legal assistance and legal practice is frequently unclear — and this ambiguity is a key defense in many UPL cases. For instance, helping someone fill out a standardized form may not constitute practicing law, while advising them on which form to use or how to answer the questions likely does. Because the line is so difficult to draw, individuals often cross it without realizing they have committed a felony.

Who Gets Charged with Unlicensed Practice of Law?

UPL charges in Florida arise in several common scenarios. In fact, many defendants never intended to practice law — they simply did not realize that their activities crossed the legal boundary. Here are the most common situations:

• Notarios and immigration consultants. In many Latin American countries, a “notario público” is a licensed legal professional. In Florida, however, a notary public has no authority to provide legal advice. Individuals who advertise as “notarios” and provide immigration-related legal services — filling out forms, advising on visa applications, or representing clients before immigration authorities — frequently face UPL charges.
• Document preparation services. Companies and individuals that prepare legal documents — wills, trusts, divorce papers, real estate contracts — sometimes cross the line into legal advice. If the preparer exercises legal judgment in selecting or completing documents, the activity constitutes UPL.
• Suspended or disbarred attorneys. An attorney whose license has been suspended or revoked who continues practicing law faces UPL charges in addition to Bar sanctions.
• Paralegals and legal assistants. While paralegals may perform legal work under attorney supervision, a paralegal who independently provides legal advice or represents clients commits UPL.
• Real estate and financial professionals. Real estate agents, accountants, and financial advisors who provide legal advice beyond their professional license can face UPL charges.
• Jailhouse lawyers. Inmates who assist other inmates with legal paperwork could theoretically face UPL charges. However, in practice, prosecutors rarely bring §454.23 charges in this context because the statute targets individuals who hold themselves out as qualified to practice law or who charge fees for legal services. As a result, an inmate informally helping a fellow inmate with a motion — without claiming to be a lawyer or accepting payment — does not fit the typical prosecution profile.

What Are the Penalties for Unlicensed Practice of Law?

Because UPL is a third-degree felony, the penalties are significant:

Warning: In addition to criminal penalties, UPL can trigger civil liability. Individuals who paid for unauthorized legal services may sue for damages, including the cost of hiring a licensed attorney to correct any harm caused by the unauthorized practice. Furthermore, victims of immigration-related UPL may suffer devastating consequences — including deportation — when unqualified practitioners file incorrect or fraudulent documents on their behalf. At The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., we understand the full scope of these consequences and fight to prevent a conviction.

What Defenses Are Available for UPL Charges?

UPL charges often involve ambiguous facts, and the defense depends heavily on the specific circumstances. Here are the strategies we use at The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.:

• The conduct did not constitute practicing law. The boundary between legal advice and general information is not always clear. If the defendant provided general information, helped fill out forms without exercising legal judgment, or assisted with tasks that do not require a law license, the conduct may fall outside the statute.
• Authorization existed. The statute applies only to persons “not licensed or otherwise authorized” to practice law. Florida law specifically authorizes some activities even without a bar license — including certain pro se assistance programs, Florida Bar-approved legal aid services, and activities permitted under the supervision of a licensed attorney.
• No willfulness. For the “holding out” and “title” provisions of §454.23, the statute requires willful conduct. If the defendant did not intentionally represent themselves as a licensed Florida lawyer, the charge fails on this critical element of the offense.
• Cultural and language misunderstandings. In notario cases, the defendant may have used the term “notario” based on their understanding of the title in their home country, without intending to claim they were a Florida-licensed attorney. We present evidence of the cultural context to challenge the willfulness element.

What Should You Do If You Are Charged with UPL?

If you are under investigation or facing UPL charges, take these steps immediately:

1. Stop the activity immediately. Continuing to practice law after learning of the investigation only strengthens the State’s case. Furthermore, ongoing conduct may result in additional charges for each new client or transaction.
2. Do not speak with investigators without an attorney. The Florida Bar’s UPL Committee and law enforcement will investigate aggressively, often using undercover operatives or cooperating witnesses. Anything you say about the services you provided becomes evidence. Invoke your right to remain silent.
3. Preserve all records. Client files, advertising materials, business cards, website content, social media profiles, and any communications about the services you provided are all relevant to the defense. In particular, evidence showing how you described your services to clients can support a defense that you did not hold yourself out as a lawyer. Do not destroy any evidence.
4. Contact a defense attorney before your first appearance. If you have been arrested and booked at Orient Road Jail or Falkenburg Road Jail, your arraignment at the Hillsborough County Courthouse happens within 24 hours. An experienced attorney can argue for favorable bond conditions and challenge the sufficiency of the charges from the start.

Frequently Asked Questions About UPL in Florida

Is unlicensed practice of law a felony in Florida?

Yes — the legislature elevated UPL under §454.23 to a third-degree felony in 2004. Before 2004, it was only a first-degree misdemeanor. The upgrade reflects the serious harm that unauthorized legal practice can cause to the public, particularly in immigration and real estate matters. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. defends clients against UPL charges throughout Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties.

Can a paralegal face UPL charges?

Yes — if a paralegal provides legal advice, represents clients, or performs legal work without the supervision of a licensed attorney, they can face UPL charges. However, a paralegal who works under proper attorney supervision and does not independently practice law is not violating the statute. Because this distinction depends heavily on the specific working arrangement, the facts of each case matter enormously. Tampa criminal defense attorney Rocky Brancato evaluates the specific working arrangement to determine the strongest defense.

What about notarios — can they practice law in Florida?

No. In Florida, a notary public has no authority to provide legal advice, prepare legal documents involving the exercise of legal judgment, or represent anyone in legal proceedings. Individuals who advertise as “notarios” and provide immigration or legal services face felony UPL charges. This is a particularly common source of prosecution in Hillsborough County’s diverse communities, where the cultural meaning of the title creates confusion. If you have been charged with UPL based on notario-related activities, The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. understands the cultural context and uses it in the defense.

Hiring a Defense Attorney

What experience does Rocky Brancato have with UPL cases?

Rocky Brancato has defended felony cases in Hillsborough County for more than 25 years. As a licensed attorney who understands the boundaries of legal practice from the inside, Rocky brings unique perspective to UPL defense. With more than 150 jury trials to verdict and an AV Preeminent rating, The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. has the experience these cases require.

Can UPL charges be dismissed?

Yes. If the conduct did not actually constitute practicing law, if the defendant had authorization that the State failed to recognize, or if constitutional violations tainted the investigation, the charges can be dismissed. In addition, we often demonstrate that the defendant’s activities fell within recognized exceptions to UPL — such as providing general information rather than legal advice. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. pursues dismissal at every stage.

How much does it cost to defend a UPL charge?

Fees depend on the complexity of the case, the full scope of the alleged unauthorized practice, and whether the case involves multiple victims or related civil proceedings. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. offers free, confidential consultations. Call (813) 727-7159 to discuss your case.

You Are Reading This for a Reason — Let Us Help

If you are facing UPL charges, the consequences are serious — a felony conviction, potential prison time, restitution, and a permanent criminal record that affects your ability to work in any professional field. However, the line between legal assistance and legal practice is frequently unclear, and these cases are highly defensible when the right attorney challenges the State’s characterization of the conduct. Rocky Brancato has defended serious felony cases in Hillsborough County for more than 25 years. We understand the nuances of UPL law and know how to challenge the State’s characterization of the conduct, demonstrate that the activities fell within recognized exceptions, and fight to prevent a conviction that would follow you for the rest of your life.

Every day you wait is a day the prosecution builds its case. The earlier Tampa criminal defense attorney Rocky Brancato gets involved, the more options you have.

Call The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. today at (813) 727-7159 for a free, confidential consultation. We are always available 24/7 and serve clients throughout Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties.

For more about how we defend felony charges, visit our White Collar Crime practice page. Because UPL charges share characteristics with other professional and white collar offenses, understanding the broader legal landscape helps inform an effective defense strategy.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice serving clients exclusively in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Each case is unique, and outcomes depend on the individual facts and circumstances involved. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Updated 5/30/2026

Flock Safety cameras and Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) are rapidly expanding across Tampa and the entire Tampa Bay area. These systems capture your vehicle’s license plate, make, model, color, and distinguishing features every time you drive past one. That data feeds into a searchable nationwide database. Thousands of law enforcement agencies can access it. Although the cameras don’t arrest you, the data they collect can trigger real-time alerts. Those alerts lead to traffic stops, criminal investigations, and arrests.

Recent reporting confirmed alarming numbers. Florida Highway Patrol conducted more than 250 immigration-related searches using Flock’s ALPR system between March and May 2025. This raises serious concerns about local surveillance technology intersecting with federal immigration enforcement in our community.

ARE YOU FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES OR AN INVESTIGATION?

Whether your case involves ALPR evidence, a traffic stop, or an immigration-related encounter—you need the right attorney. You need someone who understands how prosecutors use emerging surveillance technology to build cases.

Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato | The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
(813) 727-7159
Free, Confidential Consultations | Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas & Pasco Counties

I’m Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato. For over 25 years, I’ve defended clients in Hillsborough County against criminal charges built on every type of evidence. That includes the newest surveillance technologies that most attorneys haven’t caught up with yet.

How Do Flock Cameras and ALPRs Work in Tampa and Hillsborough County?

Flock Safety cameras are solar-powered, motion-activated cameras that capture detailed images of every vehicle that passes them. Specifically, each camera records your license plate number, vehicle make, model, color, and unique identifying features such as bumper stickers, roof racks, or body damage. Flock calls this its “Vehicle Fingerprint” technology. The system then uploads that data to a centralized, searchable cloud database hosted on Amazon Web Services (AWS).

In Tampa and Hillsborough County, multiple agencies currently use this technology. The Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office (HCSO) has deployed Flock cameras across the county, and Tampa Police Department signed its own contract with Flock Safety. In addition, private homeowner associations in communities like Temple Terrace have purchased Flock cameras and share data with local law enforcement when requested.

HOW THE TECHNOLOGY WORKS

Flock and ALPR systems operate in two primary modes. Real-time alerts notify law enforcement the moment a camera detects a matching plate. These matches include active warrants, stolen vehicle reports, or BOLO alerts. The system integrates with the FBI’s National Crime Information Center (NCIC) and state hotlists. Historical searches allow investigators to query the database. They can look up any vehicle’s past locations, travel patterns, and timestamps.

Flock’s standard data retention is 30 days, after which footage and data are automatically hard-deleted from the cloud. However, individual agencies can negotiate longer retention periods with the approval of a governing body, and some Florida agencies retain ALPR data for up to three years under FDLE guidelines.

The Flock network now includes over 70,000 cameras used by more than 5,000 municipalities nationwide. As a result, a single search can track a vehicle’s movements across jurisdictions, cities, and even state lines.

Because I taught criminal procedure at the police academy, I understand exactly how law enforcement uses these tools to build probable cause—and where they overstep. The Brancato Law Firm challenges ALPR-based evidence at every stage of a criminal case.

Can a Flock Camera or ALPR Hit Lead to a Traffic Stop and Arrest in Tampa?

Yes. However, there are important legal limitations that most people—and many attorneys—don’t fully understand. Here’s how the process typically works in Hillsborough County:

First, a Flock or ALPR camera detects a license plate that matches an alert in the system—such as a stolen vehicle report, active warrant, or BOLO from another agency.

Second, the system sends a real-time notification to local law enforcement officers in the area.

Third, officers initiate a traffic stop based on the alert. At this stage, the officer still needs independent reasonable suspicion to justify the stop under the Fourth Amendment.

Fourth, during the stop, officers may discover additional evidence—such as contraband, open warrants, or other indicators—that leads to an arrest.

THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK: ALPRS AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT

Under current law, capturing license plate data by ALPR is generally not a “search” under the Fourth Amendment. Courts have consistently ruled that plates on public roadways are in plain view. The government observes them from a place where anyone has a lawful right to be. This means minimal to no intrusion on driver privacy. More than 30 appellate and federal courts have upheld LPR evidence on this basis.

However, the law is still developing around how agencies use that data after collection. Key questions arise when agencies query databases or share information across jurisdictions. Combining ALPR data with other surveillance tools to reconstruct a person’s movements raises additional concerns. This distinction between collection and use is critical. Skilled criminal defense attorneys find opportunities to challenge ALPR-based evidence here.

CRITICAL WARNING

ALPR systems are not infallible. The OCR software that reads plates regularly misreads characters. For example, it may confuse an “8” with a “B” or a “K” with an “X.” A misread can generate a false hit. That false hit may trigger a traffic stop, a felony stop with guns drawn, or even an arrest—all based on faulty data. If law enforcement stopped or arrested you based on ALPR or Flock camera evidence, The Brancato Law Firm can challenge the accuracy and reliability of that evidence.

What Is the Connection Between Flock Cameras, 287(g) Agreements, and ICE Enforcement in Tampa?

This is the issue that has generated the most concern in our community. The convergence of three developments has created a surveillance-to-enforcement pipeline that directly affects Tampa Bay residents:

First, Flock’s expanding local presence. Tampa PD and HCSO both use Flock camera systems. The Tampa City Council is also considering integrating Flock ALPR technology into RedSpeed school zone speed cameras. This would significantly expand the number of cameras feeding data into the Flock network.

Second, the 287(g) agreement. Tampa Police Chief Bercaw signed a 287(g) agreement with ICE on February 26, 2025. Similarly, Pinellas County Sheriff Gualtieri pressured all Pinellas police chiefs to sign 287(g) agreements, and virtually all complied. Under the Task Force Model—the most common model under the current administration—these agreements allow local officers to perform federal immigration enforcement functions during routine policing activities, including traffic stops.

Third, documented immigration-related Flock searches. Reporting by Suncoast Searchlight revealed important findings. Florida Highway Patrol conducted more than 250 immigration-related searches in the Flock ALPR system between March and May 2025. Those searches used keywords like “ICE,” “ICE administrative warrant,” and “immigration overstay.” The searches spiked during Operation Tidal Wave. This was a coordinated federal-state enforcement sweep. Nearly 40% of those arrested had no criminal record.

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOU

Flock Safety states on its website that it does not work directly with ICE and that ICE does not have direct access to Flock cameras or data. However, the practical reality is more complicated. Local law enforcement agencies that do use Flock can share data with federal agencies through 287(g) agreements, informal cooperation, or cross-jurisdictional searches.

In Illinois, a Secretary of State audit found that U.S. Customs and Border Protection accessed Flock ALPR data from agencies that had never explicitly authorized sharing with federal authorities. In California, the Attorney General sued the City of El Cajon for using Flock to illegally share information across state lines. That obviously will not happen in Florida.

Even if Flock doesn’t share data directly with ICE, local agencies operating those cameras may do so. Agencies in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties now have formal agreements authorizing exactly that. The Brancato Law Firm monitors these developments closely. They directly affect how we defend our clients.

What Fourth Amendment Defenses Can a Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Raise Against ALPR Evidence?

The initial capture of a license plate in plain view is generally not a Fourth Amendment search. However, what happens after that capture often is. When police use ALPR data to track your movements over time, reconstruct travel patterns, or build a surveillance profile, they may cross into protected territory. Tampa criminal defense attorney Rocky Brancato examines exactly how law enforcement obtained and used ALPR data in each case we handle.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. | (813) 727-7159 | 25+ Years Defending Hillsborough County

What Should You Do If Law Enforcement Stops or Arrests You Based on Flock Camera or ALPR Data in Tampa?

Was your vehicle stopped based on an ALPR alert? Do you believe surveillance technology played a role in your arrest or investigation? Here is what The Brancato Law Firm recommends:

First, exercise your right to remain silent. Do not answer questions about where you’ve been, where you’re going, or who you’ve been with. ALPR data already tells law enforcement where your car has been—anything you say can only add to the evidence against you.

Second, do not consent to a vehicle search. An ALPR hit does not automatically give officers probable cause to search your vehicle. If they ask for consent, decline politely but firmly.

Third, call a criminal defense attorney immediately. ALPR evidence is time-sensitive. Flock’s standard retention is only 30 days, so early intervention matters. The Brancato Law Firm can obtain the raw ALPR data, camera maintenance records, and alert verification logs through discovery. We act quickly before the data expires or the prosecution builds its case unchallenged.

IMPORTANT NOTE FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS CONCERNED ABOUT IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT

If you or a family member had contact with law enforcement during a traffic stop where immigration status came up, speak with an attorney right away. This applies regardless of whether criminal charges resulted. The intersection of local policing, ALPR surveillance, and 287(g) agreements creates serious legal exposure. It affects both criminal defense rights and immigration proceedings. The Brancato Law Firm defends clients facing criminal charges in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties. We can coordinate with or refer you to immigration counsel when needed. Call (813) 727-7159 for a confidential consultation.

How Is Flock Camera Surveillance Expanding in Tampa Right Now?

The surveillance footprint in the Tampa Bay area is growing rapidly. Understanding where this technology stands today helps you make informed decisions about your rights.

School zone speed cameras with Flock integration. As of February 2026, Tampa City Council is considering a RedSpeed partnership. The proposal includes school zone speed cameras with Flock ALPR technology at every location. RedSpeed is the only company offering direct Flock integration. Flock ALPR comes “included in the RedSpeed price.” If approved, this would add many Flock-connected cameras throughout Tampa’s school zones. These cameras capture license plate data on every passing vehicle, not just speeders.

Rising Enforcement and Expanding Camera Networks

A 1,000% increase in school zone tickets. HCSO already uses RedSpeed cameras in Hillsborough County. Between August and December 2025, the agency issued 67,611 school zone speed tickets. That represents a more than 1,000% increase over the prior school year. Expanded enforcement hours drove this surge—from arrival/dismissal times to the entire school day. Some drivers question whether the program prioritizes revenue over safety.

HOA-installed Flock cameras. Furthermore, private homeowner associations across Hillsborough County have begun purchasing Flock cameras independently. At approximately $2,500 per camera per year with a one-time installation fee of $250–$650, the technology is accessible to mid-size communities. These HOA-owned cameras can share data with local law enforcement upon request, effectively expanding the surveillance network beyond government-owned infrastructure.

The Brancato Law Firm tracks these developments because they directly affect how evidence enters criminal cases in our jurisdiction. As more cameras come online, more stops, arrests, and investigations will rely on ALPR data—and more opportunities for defense challenges will follow.

Frequently Asked Questions About Flock Cameras, ALPRs, and Your Rights in Tampa

Facial Recognition, Data Storage, and Costs

Camera Costs and Local Expansion

Traffic Stops and Fourth Amendment Rights

Immigration, ICE, and Public Records

Challenging ALPR Evidence in Court

After an ALPR-Related Arrest

For more about our criminal defense strategies, visit our Tampa Criminal Defense page.

YOUR RIGHTS DON’T DISAPPEAR BECAUSE A CAMERA IS WATCHING.

Whether you’re facing criminal charges, an active investigation, or a traffic stop that escalated into something more—you deserve an attorney who understands the technology prosecutors are using against you.

Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato
The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
(813) 727-7159
620 E Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602

Free, Confidential Consultations | Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas & Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal assistance, contact our office for a consultation.

Related Links

• Tampa DUI Attorney
• Identity Theft Defense in Florida
• Social Media Evidence in Tampa Criminal Cases

Background of Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo

In early June 2025, the Department of Homeland Security launched “Operation At Large” in Los Angeles. Armed and masked agents carried out raids at bus stops, car washes, farms, and day-labor sites. According to court filings, many people were detained before agents asked a single question25a169_5h25.

The lawsuit argued that individuals were being stopped based only on:

• Apparent race or ethnicity
• Speaking Spanish or accented English
• Being in certain locations such as tow yards or parks
• Performing low-wage jobs such as landscaping or car washing

The district court ruled that these factors, even when combined, did not amount to reasonable suspicion under the Fourth Amendment. It issued a temporary restraining order halting the raids while the case continued.

The Supreme Court’s Decision

The government appealed, and the Supreme Court stepped in. By granting a stay, the Court allowed immigration officers to continue the challenged tactics for now.

Justice Kavanaugh’s Concurrence

Justice Brett Kavanaugh explained that immigration officers may briefly detain individuals if they have reasonable suspicion of illegal presence. He argued that in areas with high numbers of undocumented immigrants, factors such as language, job type, and presence at day-labor sites can be relevant. He also questioned whether the plaintiffs had legal standing to seek broad injunctive relief.

Justice Sotomayor’s Dissent

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson, strongly disagreed. She described evidence of U.S. citizens being violently detained. She emphasized that using race, language, and occupation sweeps in millions of innocent people, which the Fourth Amendment forbids. In her view, the Court’s stay unfairly sanctioned discriminatory seizures.

Why the Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo Immigration Case Matters

The Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo Supreme Court immigration case affects more than legal theory—it changes daily life for many.

• For immigrants: The ruling gives agents more freedom to conduct raids in cities far from the border.
• For U.S. citizens and legal residents: Latino workers and Spanish speakers risk detention unless they can quickly prove their status.
• For the courts: The decision highlights the Supreme Court’s increasing reliance on emergency rulings, often called the “shadow docket.”

These developments raise serious concerns about constitutional protections, equal treatment, and the balance of power between courts and the executive branch.

What Comes Next?

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will continue hearing the case, with arguments scheduled later this month. If the Ninth Circuit upholds the district court’s injunction, the Supreme Court may take the case on full review. Until then, the stay remains in place, allowing federal agents to conduct raids based on the disputed factors.

Key Takeaway

The Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo Supreme Court immigration case underscores how immigration policy intersects with constitutional rights. The Court’s stay tips the balance toward enforcement, at least for now. But the final outcome will depend on future rulings. Communities across Los Angeles—and the country—will be watching closely.

How The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. Can Help

If you or a loved one believe you were unlawfully stopped based only on appearance, language, or location, the Constitution may still provide important protections. Even in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling, evidence obtained through a stop based on a mere hunch—rather than clear, articulable suspicion—may be challenged in court.

At The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., we have over 25 years of experience fighting unlawful searches and seizures. Our firm can review whether a motion to suppress may be filed in your case, potentially excluding evidence obtained in violation of your rights.

Call us today at (813) 727-7159 to schedule a confidential consultation.