Impaired driving sits behind a large share of fatal crashes, with an estimated 11,904 alcohol-impaired-driving deaths in 2024 according to NHTSA. Fatal-crash cases draw intense pressure from prosecutors and the public, and that pressure is part of what a defense has to work against. At The Brancato Law Firm, we defend these cases across Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties, and our founder Rocky Brancato has tried more than 150 jury trials to verdict. Our starting point is straightforward: a serious charge is not the same as a hopeless one.

On paper, DUI manslaughter carries a four-year mandatory minimum. The realistic sentencing exposure is closer to ten years once Florida’s scoresheet is run. That gap is exactly why these cases are worth fighting hard, and why the work has to start fast.

What the State has to prove in a DUI manslaughter case

Under Florida Statute 316.193, the State has to prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt:

• The accused drove or was in actual physical control of a vehicle.
• The accused was impaired to the point that normal faculties were affected, or had a blood-alcohol or breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or higher.
• By reason of that operation, the accused caused or contributed to causing a death.

There is no intent requirement. The driver does not have to mean to hurt anyone. For a plain-language breakdown of the charge and its penalties, see our guide on what DUI manslaughter involves.

Impairment can be proven two separate ways. The “normal faculties” theory relies on officer observations, driving pattern, and field sobriety exercises. The “per se” theory relies on a chemical test reading of 0.08 or higher. Each path has its own weaknesses, which is why a real defense looks hard at both.

Why causation is where these cases are really won or lost

Florida’s causation standard is unusually low, and that is the most important thing for anyone facing this charge to understand. The statute requires only that the impaired operation “caused or contributed to causing” the death. The Florida Supreme Court in Magaw v. State held that the State does not have to prove the driver’s drinking caused the crash. It only has to prove that the operation of the vehicle did, and that any lack of care attributable to the impaired driver will satisfy the standard. Later cases like State v. Hubbard confirmed that simple negligence is enough and the driver need not be the sole cause.

That sounds discouraging. It is actually where the leverage is. Because the standard is so low, the defense invests heavily in proving that something else was the real cause.

There is a hard limit on the State’s theory. If the victim’s own conduct was the sole proximate cause of the death, there is no DUI manslaughter. The classic illustration is a pedestrian who darts into traffic where no sober driver could have avoided the collision. Impairment does not turn an unavoidable accident into a homicide.

This is why independent accident reconstruction is the single strongest line of defense. A reconstructionist examines:

• Speed, point of impact, and the angle of the collision
• Visibility, lighting, weather, and road conditions
• Whether a second driver ran a red light or otherwise intervened
• Whether a vehicle defect, such as failed brakes, a tire blowout, or steering failure, caused the loss of control

We have seen a mechanical failure rather than the driver change the entire analysis of a crash. The cause is not always the person behind the wheel. We have also taken causation fights to a jury, including a fatal wrong-way crash on the Selmon Expressway where the central battle was the State’s theory of what actually caused the collision. DUI manslaughter is a homicide charge, and we approach it with the same forensic depth we bring to any homicide defense. Each case is unique, and past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Why the four-year mandatory minimum understates the real exposure

The statute sets a four-year mandatory minimum, and many people stop reading there. The real number is usually higher because of how Florida scores these cases.

DUI manslaughter is a Level 8 offense under Florida’s Criminal Punishment Code. A primary Level 8 offense scores 74 sentencing points. A death adds 120 victim-injury points. The code then subtracts 28 from the total and multiplies the remainder by 0.75 to produce the lowest permissible prison sentence. Because a death is always part of a DUI manslaughter case, the math runs like this:

• 74 points (primary offense) plus 120 points (death) equals 194 points
• 194 minus 28 equals 166
• 166 multiplied by 0.75 equals 124.5 months, or about 10.4 years

When the guideline floor is higher than the mandatory minimum, the higher number controls, unless the judge grants a lawful downward departure. So the working exposure on a standard DUI manslaughter case is closer to ten years than four. The same scoresheet, run without the death points, would land near 34.5 months. The death points are what make these cases so serious, and they are also why a credible attack on impairment or causation matters so much to the final sentence.

How Trenton’s Law changed DUI manslaughter penalties in 2025

Trenton’s Law, passed as HB 687, took effect on October 1, 2025, and raised the stakes considerably for repeat fatal-driving cases. Two changes matter most.

First, a prior conviction for DUI manslaughter, BUI manslaughter, vehicular homicide, or vessel homicide now elevates a new DUI manslaughter to a first-degree felony, with exposure up to 30 years. Older priors count regardless of how long ago they happened.

Second, the law made refusing a breath or urine test its own separate crime in certain circumstances. The decision to refuse a test now carries its own consequences, which makes early legal advice even more important. We cover the mechanics in our explainer on refusing a breath test in Florida.

The practical takeaway: if there is any prior fatal-driving conviction in the picture, the case is in first-degree-felony territory, and the defense strategy changes accordingly.

How the chemical evidence gets challenged

The State’s impairment proof usually rests on a breath or blood test. Both are heavily regulated, and both are genuinely vulnerable when the rules are not followed.

Challenging the Intoxilyzer 8000 breath test

Florida’s evidentiary breath instrument is regulated by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement under Administrative Code Rule 11D-8. The defense can subpoena every maintenance, repair, and monthly-inspection record for the specific machine used and look for:

• Gaps in the required agency inspections
• Unauthorized repairs (only the manufacturer or an approved facility may repair the machine)
• A missing or interrupted 20-minute observation period, which guards against mouth-alcohol contamination
• Radio-frequency or temperature interference, which is worse when the machine sits in a patrol vehicle

Florida courts have excluded breath results when the program failed to follow these rules.

Challenging the blood test

In fatal crashes, blood is usually drawn. The defense scrutinizes the draw technique (an alcohol swab where a non-alcohol antiseptic is required can contaminate the sample), the chain of custody from collection through testing, and whether the lab measured hospital serum or plasma rather than whole blood. Serum readings tend to run higher than whole-blood readings, so an apparent number over 0.08 can shrink once an expert converts it correctly. Florida law also limits who may draw the blood to specific medical personnel.

Rising BAC and retrograde extrapolation

Alcohol keeps absorbing for roughly 30 to 90 minutes after drinking. A sample taken an hour or more after driving can overstate the BAC at the time the person was actually behind the wheel. A forensic toxicologist can work backward to argue the driver was below 0.08 while driving. We explore this in detail in our case study on why your BAC at the station is not your BAC behind the wheel.

Challenging the stop and the warrantless blood draw

September 2026 update: The law on warrantless blood draws just moved decisively in the defense’s favor. In State v. Marlin, No. 4D2025-1448 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 2, 2026), the Fourth District affirmed suppression of a forced blood draw in a fatal Turnpike crash, held that the natural dissipation of alcohol is never a per se exigency, and receded from the “probable cause” language in State v. Acevedo that prosecutors had been treating as an exception to the warrant requirement. Absent actual consent or case-specific exigent circumstances, a warrant is required — regardless of Florida’s implied consent law. Our full analysis is in can police take your blood without a warrant in Florida.

Two constitutional challenges come up repeatedly in fatal-crash cases.

The first is the stop. An officer needs reasonable suspicion of a traffic violation or probable cause of a crime to pull a vehicle over. If the stop was unlawful, everything that followed, including officer observations, the breath test, and the blood draw, can be suppressed as fruit of an illegal stop.

The second is the blood draw. The U.S. Supreme Court held in Missouri v. McNeely that a warrantless blood draw requires genuine exigent circumstances, and that the natural dissipation of alcohol is not, by itself, an automatic emergency. If officers had time to get a warrant and did not, the blood result may be thrown out. In a fatal crash where the driver is taken to a hospital, there is often time to seek a warrant, which makes this a live issue in many cases.

Why scene and hospital statements often get suppressed

People involved in a fatal crash are frequently questioned at the scene or in the hospital while in shock. What they say can often be kept out of evidence.

Florida’s accident-report privilege, found in Section 316.066, provides that a crash report or a statement made to an officer for the purpose of completing one may not be used as evidence in any trial, civil or criminal. Under what Florida courts call the “changing hats” doctrine, an officer has to affirmatively tell the driver that the crash investigation is over and a criminal investigation has begun, then give Miranda warnings, before those statements become admissible. Statements made during the crash-investigation phase, without that switch, are privileged.

This is a powerful suppression tool. It does not cover everything. An officer can still testify to physical observations like the odor of alcohol or slurred speech. But admissions made while a frightened driver believed he was simply helping complete a report often cannot be used against him.

The experts who actually move these cases

A serious DUI manslaughter defense is built on retained experts, and the order matters. Reconstruction comes first, because causation is the element with the most leverage.

• Accident reconstructionist. Establishes speed, impact geometry, and what actually caused the crash.
• Forensic toxicologist. Interprets BAC, handles retrograde extrapolation, and addresses serum-versus-whole-blood conversion.
• ASE-certified mechanic. Inspects the vehicle for a defect that caused the loss of control.
• Medical expert. Addresses cause of death and any pre-existing conditions.

All expert testimony has to satisfy Florida’s Daubert standard before a jury hears it. Our firm maintains a network of forensic experts, including forensic pathologists, accident reconstruction specialists, and former medical examiners. Our founder also spent years as a police academy instructor, training officers on how to investigate and testify, which sharpens cross-examination of the State’s witnesses. This is the forensic rigor we bring when we challenge the State’s forensic evidence, and it is the same standard we apply regardless of the charge. Each case is unique, and past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

DUI manslaughter vs. vehicular homicide, and how they get stacked

A fatal crash often produces two charges from the same event: DUI manslaughter and vehicular homicide. They are both second-degree felonies, but they require the State to prove different things.

When both charges are filed, the defense builds independent defenses for each so the counts do not stack against the client. You can read more about the recklessness standard in our explainer on vehicular homicide in Florida.

What does a realistic reduction look like? Because of the mandatory minimum, the only path below four years is a negotiated reduction to a lesser charge, such as DUI with serious bodily injury or reckless driving, or a lawful downward departure. Reductions are harder to win in fatal cases than in standard DUIs, because prosecutors face public pressure. What moves the needle is the strength of the defense. A genuine problem with the State’s impairment proof, a credible causation theory pointing elsewhere, or suppressible evidence is what makes the State willing to talk.

Why the first 72 hours matter most

The single most important thing a person facing this charge can do is get an experienced Tampa DUI defense team working immediately. Fatal-crash investigations move fast, and evidence disappears.

In the first hours and days after a crash, the defense can:

• Preserve the vehicle’s event data recorder, or black box, which can show speed and braking before impact
• Track down dashcam and nearby surveillance footage before it is overwritten
• Identify and interview witnesses while memories are fresh
• Assert the accident-report privilege before damaging statements get locked in
• Get an independent reconstruction started while the scene is still intact

Once skid marks fade, footage is recycled, and witnesses scatter, that leverage is gone. Early counsel preserves the evidence the defense will need later. The sooner it starts, the more there is to work with.

Frequently asked questions about DUI manslaughter in Florida

Is DUI manslaughter a felony in Florida?

Yes. It is a second-degree felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison. It becomes a first-degree felony, with exposure up to 30 years, if the driver left the scene or has a qualifying prior conviction under Trenton’s Law.

What is the minimum sentence for DUI manslaughter in Florida?

The statute sets a four-year mandatory minimum. In practice, the sentencing scoresheet usually produces a higher floor, often around 124.5 months (about 10.4 years), because a death adds 120 points to the calculation.

Can a DUI manslaughter charge be reduced or dropped?

Sometimes. Because of the mandatory minimum, the routes below four years are a negotiated reduction to a lesser charge or a lawful downward departure. A serious problem with the State’s proof of impairment or causation is usually what makes a reduction realistic.

Does the State have to prove the driver caused the crash?

The State has to prove the impaired driving caused or contributed to the death, which is a low standard. But if someone else, or the victim’s own conduct, was the sole cause of the crash, there is no DUI manslaughter.

Serious charges still have real defenses

A DUI manslaughter charge is among the most serious a person can face in Florida, and the exposure is real. But the State carries the burden on impairment and on causation, and both are open to challenge. The chemical evidence has to be collected and maintained by the rules. The stop and the blood draw have to satisfy the Fourth Amendment. The cause of the crash has to hold up against an independent reconstruction. The work that decides these cases starts long before trial.

This is the kind of case our firm is built for. We keep a limited caseload so every case gets thorough preparation, we prepare every matter as if it will go to trial, and our founder ran the largest criminal defense operation in Tampa Bay as Chief Operations Officer of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office, where he oversaw a staff of over 100 attorneys. That system-level knowledge informs how we read a fatal-crash case from the first day.

If you or someone in your family has been arrested or is under investigation for DUI manslaughter in the Tampa Bay area, the sooner you have a defense team in place, the more evidence can be preserved and the more options stay open. Call The Brancato Law Firm at (813) 727-7159 for a free, confidential consultation.

Each case is unique. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

I’m Tampa criminal defense attorney Rocky Brancato. With more than 25 years defending criminal cases in Hillsborough County, an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell, and Super Lawyers recognition, I have handled theft and shoplifting cases at every level — from petit theft misdemeanors to first-degree felony grand theft and organized retail theft rings.

How Does Florida Law Define Theft?

Under Florida law (§812.014), theft means knowingly obtaining or using someone else’s property with the intent to deprive them of it — either temporarily or permanently. This broad definition covers everything from pocketing merchandise at a store to taking a vehicle, stealing cash, or using someone’s credit card without permission.

Florida Statute §812.014: The State must prove you knowingly obtained or used someone else’s property with intent to deprive them of it. If you did not know the property belonged to someone else, or if you had no intent to steal, the theft charge fails. This is where The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. focuses the defense.

Two words matter most in every theft case: “knowingly” and “intent.” If you accidentally walked out of a store with an item, or if you believed you had permission to use the property, you did not commit theft under Florida law. At The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., we challenge both elements in every case.

What Are the Penalties for Theft in Florida?

The penalties for theft depend almost entirely on the value of the property stolen. Here is how the charges and penalties break down under §812.014:

Because the dollar amount determines whether you face a misdemeanor or a felony, the State’s valuation of the property is one of the most important — and most contested — issues in any theft case. At The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., we challenge inflated valuations in every case, because even a small reduction in the estimated value can change the charge entirely.

Case Study — Not Guilty, Grand Theft Auto: We represented a man charged with grand theft auto. At trial, Rocky established reasonable doubt about whether the client had committed the crime. The jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Case Study — Not Guilty, Grand Theft Auto (Scrap Vehicle): In another grand theft auto case, our client had purchased a car for scrap and was accused of stealing it. At trial, Rocky demonstrated the client had purchased the vehicle legitimately, creating reasonable doubt about criminal intent. The jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

When Does Theft Become a Felony in Florida?

Theft crosses the felony line in several situations under §812.014. The most common trigger is a property value of $750 or more — that is grand theft in the third degree, a third-degree felony carrying up to 5 years in prison. However, there are other situations where even lower-value theft becomes a felony:

Warning: Theft becomes a felony regardless of the dollar amount when the stolen property is a firearm, a motor vehicle, a will or testamentary instrument, a stop sign, or anhydrous ammonia. Furthermore, stealing property valued at just $40 or more from a dwelling is automatically a third-degree felony under §812.014(2)(d). And if you have two or more prior theft convictions, even a petit theft under $100 jumps to a third-degree felony. These enhancements catch many people off guard.

Prior convictions play a major role in theft sentencing. A first petit theft is a misdemeanor. A second petit theft — even for something worth $10 — becomes a first-degree misdemeanor. A third petit theft becomes a felony. This escalation is why we fight to keep first-offense theft charges off your record at The Brancato Law Firm, P.A..

Case Study — Not Guilty, Felony Petit Theft: We represented a man charged with felony petit theft — enhanced to a felony because of prior theft convictions. He was accused of working in concert with a woman to take merchandise past the point of sale. At trial, Rocky established questions about whether the man was really linked to the woman. The jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

What Is Retail Theft (Shoplifting) in Florida?

Florida does not have a separate “shoplifting” statute. Instead, shoplifting falls under the retail theft provisions of §812.015. Retail theft means taking merchandise, altering a price tag, transferring items between containers, or removing a shopping cart — all with the intent to deprive the merchant of the property or its full retail value.

For a single incident, penalties follow the same value-based framework as general theft under §812.014. However, §812.015 adds harsher penalties for organized and repeat retail theft:

• Organized retail theft ($750+): Third-degree felony — up to 5 years. This includes coordinating with others, committing thefts at multiple locations within 120 days, or using distraction techniques.
• Organized retail theft ($3,000+): Second-degree felony — up to 15 years.
• Repeat organized or armed retail theft: First-degree felony — up to 30 years.
• Possessing anti-shoplifting countermeasures: Third-degree felony — up to 5 years, even if you never used the device.

In addition, §812.015 gives merchants the legal right to detain you if they have probable cause to believe you committed retail theft. The detention must be “reasonable” in manner and duration — but the statute shields the merchant from false arrest liability if they followed the rules. At The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., we examine every merchant detention for constitutional violations.

What Happens If You Resist a Loss Prevention Officer?

If you struggle with a loss prevention officer or store employee while they are trying to recover stolen merchandise, you can be charged with resisting a merchant under §812.015(6). This is a first-degree misdemeanor carrying up to one year in jail — and it is charged in addition to the theft itself.

Case Study — Robbery Reduced to Misdemeanor Retail Theft: We represented a man who was charged with robbery after stealing from a grocery store. The robbery charge was based on a struggle with the loss prevention officer over the goods. At trial, the jury rejected the robbery charge entirely and returned verdicts of misdemeanor retail theft and misdemeanor resisting a merchant — avoiding a potential felony conviction that could have meant years in prison. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

This case illustrates an important point. Prosecutors sometimes overcharge theft cases — especially when a physical struggle is involved. A struggle with a loss prevention officer does not automatically make the crime a robbery. Robbery under §812.13 requires force, violence, assault, or putting the victim in fear during the taking. If the force only happened after the taking — during the merchant’s attempt to recover the goods — the robbery charge may not hold up. At The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., we challenge overcharged theft cases aggressively.

What Is Dealing in Stolen Property in Florida?

Dealing in stolen property is a separate and serious charge under §812.019 — a second-degree felony carrying up to 15 years in prison. If you organized or directed the operation, the charge jumps to a first-degree felony with up to 30 years. Because dealing in stolen property involves different elements and defenses than theft, we have written a separate, detailed guide: What Is Dealing in Stolen Property in Florida? If you are facing this charge, that guide covers the elements, penalties, and defense strategies that apply specifically to §812.019 cases.

How We Fight Theft and Shoplifting Charges in Tampa

Because I served as Chief Operations Officer and Chief Assistant Public Defender of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office — managing over 100 attorneys across every division — I know how prosecutors handle theft cases in the 13th Judicial Circuit and where those cases break down. Here is how we defend theft charges at The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.:

• Challenge the property valuation. The dollar amount determines the charge. We examine every valuation — retail price versus fair market value, depreciation, inflated loss prevention estimates — and challenge the number when it pushes the charge higher.
• Attack the intent element. Theft requires proof you intended to steal. If you forgot to scan an item at self-checkout, left a store with unpaid merchandise, or believed you had permission to use the property, the intent element fails.
• Challenge the identification. In organized retail theft cases, the State must prove you committed each theft. Surveillance footage quality, witness reliability, and circumstantial evidence all present opportunities.
• Suppress illegally obtained evidence. If law enforcement conducted an illegal search, obtained a confession without Miranda warnings, or the merchant detention violated your rights, we file motions to suppress.
• Negotiate for diversion or withhold. For first-time offenders, we push for pre-trial diversion that results in dismissal, or a withhold of adjudication that keeps a conviction off your record.

Can Theft Charges Be Dropped or Reduced in Florida?

Yes — and in many cases, the result depends on how early you hire a defense attorney. Here are the most common paths to reducing or dismissing theft charges:

• Valuation challenge. If we can show the property value is below the next threshold — for instance, below $750 to keep the charge a misdemeanor — the severity of the case changes entirely.
• Lack of intent. If you did not intend to steal, the charge fails. This applies to self-checkout errors, mix-ups, borrowed property disputes, and accidental takings.
• Pre-file advocacy. If you contact The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. before the State files charges, we can present mitigating evidence to the intake prosecutor at the State Attorney’s Office, 13th Judicial Circuit — sometimes preventing the charge entirely.
• Diversion programs. Hillsborough County offers pre-trial diversion for first-time theft offenders. Successful completion results in dismissal — no conviction on your record.
• Restitution agreements. Paying restitution to the merchant or property owner can lead to reduced charges or dismissal — especially when the State’s primary interest is making the victim whole.

The earlier you contact a defense attorney, the more options you have. Surveillance footage gets overwritten and prosecutors make charging decisions quickly after an arrest.

What Should You Do After a Theft or Shoplifting Arrest?

If you or someone you love has been arrested for theft and booked at Orient Road Jail or Falkenburg Road Jail, take these steps immediately:

1. Do not make any statements. Loss prevention officers and police will want you to admit to the theft — and possibly to other thefts you did not commit. Stay silent until you speak with an attorney.
2. Call a defense attorney before your first appearance. Your first hearing at the Hillsborough County Courthouse happens within 24 hours. An attorney can argue for a reasonable bond and favorable conditions of release.
3. Do not sign anything. Some stores ask you to sign a “civil demand” letter or an admission of guilt. Do not sign any documents without an attorney’s review.
4. Preserve any evidence. Receipts, bank statements, text messages, and surveillance footage from your own devices can all support your defense.

Frequently Asked Questions About Theft in Florida

What is the difference between petit theft and grand theft in Florida?

The difference is the value of the property. Under §812.014, theft of property valued at less than $750 is generally petit theft — a misdemeanor. Theft of property valued at $750 or more is grand theft — a felony. However, certain types of property (firearms, motor vehicles, property stolen from a dwelling) are automatically grand theft regardless of value. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. defends clients facing both petit theft and grand theft charges in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties.

Can I go to jail for shoplifting in Florida?

Yes. Even a first-time shoplifting offense can result in jail time. Petit theft of the second degree (under $100) carries up to 60 days. Petit theft of the first degree ($100–$749) carries up to one year. If the value is $750 or more, or if you have prior theft convictions, the charge becomes a felony with potential prison time. Tampa criminal defense attorney Rocky Brancato evaluates every shoplifting case for diversion and dismissal opportunities.

Is shoplifting a felony in Florida?

It depends on the value of the merchandise and your criminal history. A single shoplifting incident under $750 with no prior record is a misdemeanor. However, shoplifting becomes a felony if the value exceeds $750, if you coordinated with others, if you committed thefts at multiple locations within 120 days, or if you have prior theft convictions. Under §812.015, organized retail theft with a firearm is a first-degree felony carrying up to 30 years.

More Questions About Theft Defense

What is the civil demand letter after shoplifting?

After a shoplifting incident, many retailers send a “civil demand” letter requesting payment — typically $200 to $500 — as compensation for the theft. This letter is separate from any criminal charge. Paying the civil demand does not make the criminal case go away, and not paying it does not make the criminal case worse. Before responding to a civil demand letter, consult with The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. to understand your options.

Can theft charges be expunged in Florida?

It depends on the outcome. If the charge is dropped, dismissed, or resolved through a diversion program, you may qualify for expungement. If you receive a withhold of adjudication, sealing may be possible. However, a formal conviction generally cannot be expunged. Because theft convictions affect employment, housing, and professional licensing, we fight for record-clearing outcomes from the start.

Hiring a Theft Defense Attorney

What experience does Rocky Brancato have with theft cases?

Rocky Brancato has defended theft and shoplifting cases for more than 25 years in Hillsborough County — from petit theft misdemeanors to organized retail theft felonies. As the former Chief Operations Officer and Chief Assistant Public Defender, he managed over 100 attorneys. With more than 150 jury trials to verdict, an AV Preeminent rating, and Super Lawyers recognition, Rocky brings senior-level experience to every theft defense. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. serves Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties.

How much does a theft defense lawyer cost in Tampa?

Fees depend on whether the charge is a misdemeanor or felony, the complexity of the evidence, and whether the case goes to trial. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. offers free, confidential consultations so you can understand your options. Call (813) 727-7159 to discuss your case.

You Are Reading This for a Reason — Let Us Help

If you are facing theft or shoplifting charges, the consequences are more serious than most people expect. Even a misdemeanor conviction creates a permanent record that follows you on background checks for employment, housing, and professional licensing. We have spent more than 25 years defending theft cases in Hillsborough County, and we know how to challenge inflated valuations, expose overcharged cases, and secure diversion programs that keep convictions off your record.

Every day you wait is a day the prosecution builds its case. The earlier Tampa criminal defense attorney Rocky Brancato gets involved, the more options you have.

Call The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. today at (813) 727-7159 for a free, confidential consultation. We are available 24/7 and serve clients throughout Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties.

For more about how we defend property crime charges, visit our Violent Crimes practice page. You can also read our guides on What Is Robbery in Florida?, What Is Burglary in Florida?, and What Is Dealing in Stolen Property in Florida?

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice serving clients exclusively in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Each case is unique, and outcomes depend on the individual facts and circumstances involved. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Updated 5/30/2026