A robbery case usually turns on two questions the arrest report does not settle: who took the property, and whether force or fear was really part of the taking. I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm, and I have put both questions to juries across more than 150 jury trials to verdict. Our attorneys defend strong-arm robbery, armed robbery, sudden snatching, and carjacking charges in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties, starting with the identification evidence, the video, and the exact words of the charging document.

What does the State have to prove in a Florida robbery case?

The State must prove a taking, from the person or custody of another, with intent to deprive, accomplished by force, violence, assault, or putting in fear. Section 812.13(1), Florida Statutes, defines robbery as “the taking of money or other property which may be the subject of larceny from the person or custody of another, with intent to either permanently or temporarily deprive the person or the owner of the money or other property, when in the course of the taking there is the use of force, violence, assault, or putting in fear.”

Robbery does not require a face-to-face grab. Property is in a victim’s “custody” when it is under the victim’s control so that the victim could have prevented the taking without the violence or intimidation. In Acosta v. State, 399 So. 3d 1118 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024), the victims had been thrown off a jet ski that was floating away when the defendant took it, and the Third District held that was still a taking from their custody. Our Tampa violent crime lawyer team tests each element separately, because a missing element often turns a robbery into a theft.

When does force turn a theft into a robbery?

Force turns a theft into robbery when the victim resists and the offender overcomes that resistance. In Robinson v. State, 692 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 1997), the Florida Supreme Court held that “the perpetrator must employ more than the force necessary to remove the property from the person. Rather, there must be resistance by the victim that is overcome by the physical force of the offender.” A snatching without that kind of resistance “amounts to theft rather than robbery.”

Timing matters too. Under section 812.13(3)(b), force counts if it happens “either prior to, contemporaneous with, or subsequent to the taking of the property and if it and the act of taking constitute a continuous series of acts or events.” Robinson recognized that the 1987 amendment adopting this language replaced the older rule that force had to come before or during the taking. Courts analyze an “afterthought” argument “in light of the entire circumstances of the incident,” as the Third District put it in Acosta. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm look closely at the sequence, because force that comes after a clean break, or that was an afterthought unrelated to the taking, can defeat the robbery charge.

What are the degrees and penalties for robbery in Florida?

The degree depends on what the offender carried, not what the offender showed or used. Section 812.13(2) uses the word “carried,” so the State does not have to prove the weapon was displayed.

The prison maximums come from section 775.082, Florida Statutes, and the fines from section 775.083, Florida Statutes. Because carrying a weapon is already an element of armed robbery, the general weapon reclassification in section 775.087(1) does not raise the degree again.

Armed robbery with a firearm or deadly weapon carries a possible life sentence. I meet the Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.112 qualifications to defend capital cases, and our attorneys prepare life-felony robbery cases with the same trial-level investigation.

How is sudden snatching different from robbery?

Sudden snatching is a separate, lesser crime for grabbing property from a person who becomes aware of the taking, with no force beyond what the grab requires. Under section 812.131, Florida Statutes, the State does not have to show that the offender “used any amount of force beyond that effort necessary to obtain possession,” that the victim resisted, or that the victim was injured. The Legislature created it in 1999, after Robinson.

Sudden snatching is a third-degree felony (up to 5 years) when no weapon is carried. It becomes a second-degree felony (up to 15 years) when the offender carried a firearm or other deadly weapon. When a robbery charge rests on a quick grab of a phone, purse, or chain, our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm ask whether the facts fit sudden snatching or theft instead.

What is carjacking in Florida?

Carjacking is robbery of a motor vehicle. Section 812.133, Florida Statutes, covers taking “a motor vehicle which may be the subject of larceny from the person or custody of another,” with intent to deprive, “when in the course of the taking there is the use of force, violence, assault, or putting in fear.”

Carjacking is a first-degree felony even when no weapon is involved, so it is charged one degree above unarmed robbery. The Brancato Law Firm reviews whether the vehicle was truly in the driver’s custody and whether the force came during the taking or in a separate event.

How does Florida’s 10-20-Life law apply to robbery?

Robbery and attempted robbery are on the 10-20-Life list. Under section 775.087(2)(a), Florida Statutes, a person convicted of robbery who “actually possessed a ‘firearm’ or ‘destructive device'” faces a 10-year mandatory minimum. Discharging the firearm raises the minimum to 20 years, and discharging it and causing “death or great bodily harm” means a minimum of 25 years up to life.

Possession under the statute means “carrying it on the person,” or having the firearm “within immediate physical reach with ready access with the intent to use the firearm during the commission of the offense.” The court cannot withhold adjudication or suspend the sentence, and there is no gain-time or early release before the minimum is served. For the full statute, see our guide to Florida’s 10-20-Life law.

What changed about 10-20-Life sentences in 2025?

The 2025 law kept consecutive minimums mandatory when a person is convicted of several qualifying felonies, and gave judges discretion when a qualifying felony is paired with an unlisted one. Chapter 2025-81, Laws of Florida, effective July 1, 2025, rewrote the consecutive-sentence rules in section 775.087(2). The earlier 2023 text said the court “shall impose any term of imprisonment provided for in this subsection consecutively to any other term of imprisonment imposed for any other felony offense.”

Current paragraph (d) requires the court to impose the minimum “for each qualifying felony offense for which the person is convicted,” and, when there are several, to “impose any such terms of imprisonment consecutively.” New paragraph (e) says that when a qualifying felony is committed “in conjunction with any other felony offense not enumerated,” the court “may impose” the minimum consecutively. Two counts of robbery with a firearm, one for each victim, still mean two minimums served back to back, while a robbery count paired with an unlisted felony leaves the judge a choice. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm check the offense date and the count structure on every case, because they can decide whether a client faces 10 years or 20.

Is a BB gun a deadly weapon in a Florida robbery?

It can be, and the jury decides. In Dale v. State, 703 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 1997), the defendant said “I have a gun,” and the gun later recovered was a working gas-operated BB or pellet gun that resembled a 9 mm Beretta. The Florida Supreme Court held that whether a BB or pellet gun is a deadly weapon, meaning whether it is “likely to produce death or great bodily injury,” is “a factual question to be answered by the jury in each case.” The Court added that the gun being recovered without BBs, pellets, or a gas cartridge “is not dispositive.”

The victim’s belief about whether the gun was loaded is not the test. The Court in Dale expressly did not decide whether a BB gun is a firearm. Under section 790.001(9), Florida Statutes, a firearm is a weapon that will, is designed to, or may readily be converted to expel a projectile “by the action of an explosive.” That definition matters because the 10-20-Life minimums require a firearm. When the object is a BB gun, a replica, or a stun gun, our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm challenge which category the State can prove.

Does wearing a mask make a robbery more serious?

Sometimes. Under section 775.0845, Florida Statutes, an offense is reclassified to the next higher degree if the offender “was wearing a hood, mask, or other device that concealed his or her identity.” A third-degree felony becomes a second-degree felony, and a second-degree felony becomes a first-degree felony.

The statute has no step above a first-degree felony. A mask raises strong-arm robbery from a second-degree to a first-degree felony and raises sudden snatching by one degree, but it cannot raise robbery with a weapon or robbery with a firearm, which are already first-degree felonies. The reclassified offense also ranks one level higher on the scoresheet. The Brancato Law Firm checks whether the State can prove the face covering actually concealed identity, which is the statute’s own requirement.

Can a shoplifting arrest become a robbery charge?

Yes. When force or fear enters a shoplifting incident, the State may charge robbery. In Atmore v. State, No. 2D2024-0584 (Fla. 2d DCA Aug. 13, 2025), a Hillsborough County case, a woman shoplifting at a Sunglass Hut brandished what appeared to be a stun gun when the manager told her to stop, kept taking merchandise, and fled. She was convicted of robbery with a weapon. The Second District held she was entitled to an instruction on resisting a merchant as a lesser offense, though it found the error harmless.

Lesser offenses decide many robbery trials. In J.M. v. State, No. 2D2022-3344 (Fla. 2d DCA Jan. 31, 2025), another Hillsborough case, the trial court found the State could not prove intent to deprive in a robbery charge against a juvenile and instead found aggravated assault. The Second District reversed because the petition never alleged an assault with the weapon, and convicting on an uncharged lesser was fundamental error. Our post on how to fight a theft charge in Florida covers retail theft and resisting a merchant.

How many robbery arrests happen in Hillsborough County?

Fewer than a decade ago. In 2025, Hillsborough County recorded 441 robbery arrests, according to FDLE arrest data published by Florida Health CHARTS, down from 757 in 2016, a 41.7% drop. Florida recorded 6,462 robbery arrests in 2025. These figures count arrest events, not reported robberies, and they leave out cases begun by notice to appear or sworn complaint without a physical arrest.

Fewer arrests do not mean lighter cases. Robbery charges in Hillsborough County are filed by the State Attorney’s Office for the 13th Judicial Circuit, and a robbery arrest means a first appearance within 24 hours, usually from the Orient Road Jail. Robbery is a “dangerous crime” for bond purposes, so the judge cannot grant nonmonetary release at first appearance, as our guide to bond hearings in Tampa explains. Our Hillsborough County criminal defense attorney team prepares for that hearing from the first call.

How do our attorneys defend a robbery charge?

We start with the State’s weakest element, which is often identification. Our attorneys work through five questions in every robbery case:

1. Is the identification reliable? The National Research Council’s report Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification (2014) found that memory is “highly malleable and continuously evolving” and that witness confidence “can be powerfully swayed by many factors.” Florida’s section 92.70, Florida Statutes, requires lineups to be run by an independent administrator with set instructions, and noncompliance can support a motion to suppress and must be explained to the jury.
2. Does circumstantial evidence really point to the client? In Young v. State, No. 2D2025-0042 (Fla. 2d DCA July 10, 2026), a Hillsborough case, the Second District affirmed the convictions but held that “the prohibition against pyramiding inferences remains a separate and distinct evidentiary principle.” A jury cannot “draw an inference from an inference.”
3. Was there force or fear during the taking? If not, the charge may be theft or sudden snatching under Robinson.
4. What was carried? The weapon category sets the degree and decides whether 10-20-Life applies.
5. What does the charging document allege? Under J.M., the lesser offenses available at trial depend on what the State charged.

Repeat-offender laws raise the stakes. Under section 775.082(9), robbery, carjacking, and home-invasion robbery committed within 3 years of release from prison qualify for prison releasee reoffender sentencing, which means life for a felony punishable by life and 100 percent of the sentence served. Our posts on prison releasee reoffender sentencing and how to defend against an armed robbery charge in Florida go further on those cases.

Real results in robbery cases

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. More results are on our case results page.

Frequently asked questions about robbery charges in Florida

Can robbery charges be dropped in Florida?

Yes. Robbery charges can be dropped or reduced when the identification is unreliable, when the evidence shows no force or fear during the taking, or when the State cannot prove the weapon it charged. The Brancato Law Firm obtained a robbery dismissal for a client in November 2025, and we raise each of these issues with the prosecutor early.

Can I be charged with armed robbery if I never showed a weapon?

Yes. Section 812.13(2) turns on whether the offender “carried” a weapon, so display is not required. The Brancato Law Firm tests how the State intends to prove the weapon existed, as described on our Tampa violent crime defense page.

What is the difference between robbery and theft in Florida?

Robbery requires force, violence, assault, or putting in fear during the taking, and theft does not. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm use the Robinson resistance rule to argue for theft when a case involved a grab without a struggle, and our guide to theft charges in Florida covers the theft penalties.

Does 10-20-Life apply to strong-arm robbery?

No. The 10-20-Life minimums apply only when the State proves actual possession of a firearm or destructive device, so a robbery with no gun does not trigger them. The Brancato Law Firm reviews the firearm evidence closely, because a replica or BB gun may not meet the statutory definition.

Should I talk to a detective who calls about a robbery?

No, not before speaking with a lawyer, because anything you tell a detective can be used to build the case, including an honest mistake about a time or place. The Brancato Law Firm offers representation before charges are filed and can speak with the detective for you.

Talk to a Tampa robbery defense attorney now

Witness memories change and store video is overwritten within days, so the first week after a robbery arrest matters most. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, will secure the video, test the identification, and prepare for the first appearance and bond hearing. Call (813) 727-7159 for a free, confidential consultation. You can call us at any hour, and our office is two blocks from the courthouse. Our firm has Spanish-speaking staff, and attorney Jean-Luc Adrien speaks Spanish, Haitian Creole, and French. Read about our Spanish and Haitian Creole criminal defense services.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Tampa Violent Crime Lawyer page.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.

620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602

(813) 727-7159

Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

This guide covers what the state has to prove, the defenses that actually move the needle, and why the early hours and weeks of a case matter more in armed robbery than almost any other charge.

What Armed Robbery Means Under Florida Law

Robbery is defined in Florida Statute 812.13 as the taking of money or property from a person, by force, violence, assault, or putting the victim in fear, with intent to deprive them of it. The statute then layers the penalty based on what the accused was carrying.

There is a meaningful legal difference between strong-arm robbery, robbery with a weapon, and robbery with a firearm or other deadly weapon. That difference controls the maximum sentence, the mandatory minimum, and whether the case is bondable.

Moving a case down even one row on this chart can mean a 15-year swing in maximum exposure and removes the 10-20-Life floor entirely. That is what most armed robbery defense work is actually about.

The Elements the State Has to Prove

To convict for armed robbery, the prosecutor must prove every one of the following beyond a reasonable doubt:

• A taking of money or property that could be the subject of theft
• The property was taken from the person or custody of another
• Force, violence, assault, or putting in fear was used in the course of the taking
• Intent to permanently or temporarily deprive the owner of the property
• The accused carried a firearm, deadly weapon, or other weapon during the offense

If the state cannot prove any one of these elements, the charge fails or has to be reduced.

A note on what “carrying” means. The Florida Supreme Court held in State v. Baker, 452 So. 2d 927 (Fla. 1984), that the enhancement attaches to the carrying of the weapon, not the brandishing of it. The weapon does not have to be pointed at anyone. But “carry” still has limits. In State v. Burris, 875 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 2004), the court held that an automobile cannot be “carried” within the meaning of the statute. Edge cases like these are exactly the kind of pressure points a trial-tested defense attorney is looking for.

Why Armed Robbery Triggers Florida’s 10-20-Life Law

Florida Statute 775.087, known as 10-20-Life, was enacted in 1999 and remains the dominant sentencing factor in any armed robbery case involving a firearm. It strips judicial sentencing discretion from the judge.

Three things about this statute make it especially dangerous:

1. The mandatory term is in addition and consecutive to the sentence for the underlying robbery.
2. The judge has no authority to depart downward once the conviction is entered.
3. Only the State Attorney’s Office can waive the minimum. The judge cannot. The defense attorney cannot.

That last point is the entire game. Once a 10-20-Life-eligible armed robbery conviction is in place, the floor is fixed. The leverage point is at charging and at plea negotiation, before the conviction. That is why we treat the first 30 days after an arrest as the most important window of the case.

Defenses That Actually Move the Needle in Armed Robbery Cases

Not every defense is equal. In armed robbery, a handful of defenses produce most of the meaningful outcomes, whether that means dismissal, a not-guilty verdict at trial, or a charge reduction that eliminates the mandatory minimum.

Mistaken Identity and Eyewitness Misidentification

Eyewitness misidentification is the single most attackable evidence type in stranger-on-stranger robbery cases. According to the Innocence Project, more than 60% of their wrongfully convicted clients were convicted in part because of eyewitness misidentification. Earlier DNA-era data put the figure even higher, in the 71 to 75% range.

Florida has officially recognized this risk. In 2017, the legislature passed Florida Statute 92.70, which requires non-participating, blind administration of live and photo lineups. The Florida Supreme Court adopted Standard Jury Instruction 3.9(c) the following year, which directs jurors to weigh nine specific factors when evaluating eyewitness testimony, including the witness’s opportunity to observe, lapses of time, and cross-racial identification effects.

When we challenge an identification, we are usually working on three fronts at once:

• Suppression of any identification obtained through suggestive procedures (showups, single-photo displays, suggestive lineups)
• Cross-examination focused on the conditions of observation, lighting, distance, stress, weapon focus, and the gap between the event and the identification
• The 3.9(c) instruction at trial, which forces the jury to evaluate the identification through the same factors social science has shown to matter

In one armed robbery acquittal we tried, the victim had failed to mention a distinctive arm tattoo when describing the suspect to police. That single omission, paired with cross-examination on the conditions of the identification, was enough to win a not-guilty verdict. Each case is unique, and past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Alibi Defense

If the accused was not at the scene, that fact has to be developed methodically. Cell-tower records, GPS data, ride-share records, physical surveillance from third-party businesses, and corroborating witness testimony can all place a defendant somewhere other than the alleged crime location. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.200 requires advance written notice of alibi witnesses, so this defense has to be planned, not improvised.

One practical point: most security DVRs overwrite their footage in 14 to 30 days. If alibi video exists at a gas station, restaurant, parking lot, or apartment complex, it has to be preserved fast. That is one of the most concrete reasons early counsel matters in robbery cases.

Challenging the “Weapon” Element

The line between “weapon,” “deadly weapon,” and “firearm” is where many armed robbery cases shift in the defendant’s favor. The legal definitions matter.

• Firearm is defined in Florida Statute 790.001 as a weapon designed to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive, the frame or receiver of such a weapon, a silencer, a destructive device, or a machine gun.
• Weapon is defined as any dirk, knife, metallic knuckles, slungshot, billie, tear gas gun, chemical weapon, or other deadly weapon other than a firearm. A common pocketknife, plastic knife, or blunt-bladed table knife is excluded.
• Deadly weapon is a jury question. A weapon qualifies as deadly if it is used or threatened to be used in a way likely to produce death or great bodily harm.

Florida case law has carved out real defense room here:

• State v. Burris, 875 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 2004): an automobile cannot be “carried” as a deadly weapon.
• Dale v. State, 703 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 1997): whether an unloaded BB gun is a “deadly weapon” is a jury question, not a foregone conclusion.
• D.D. v. State: when the state could not prove the object was an actual firearm, the conviction was reduced from robbery with a deadly weapon to robbery with a weapon.
• Butler v. State, 602 So. 2d 1303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992): when the state could not prove the defendant actually possessed a weapon, the appellate court reversed the armed robbery conviction and directed entry of judgment for unarmed robbery.

If the alleged “firearm” was a BB gun, a replica, a toy, or an object that was never recovered, the path from a life-felony charge to a 30-year first-degree felony to a 15-year second-degree felony is open. Each step down removes layers of mandatory time.

Specific Intent Defenses and the “Afterthought” Rule

Robbery is a specific-intent crime. The state has to prove the accused intended to permanently or temporarily deprive the owner of the property at the moment force was used. If force was used for a different reason, and the taking happened only as an afterthought, the charge is theft, not robbery.

The Florida Supreme Court explained the rule in Mahn v. State, 714 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 1998), holding that where property is taken to effect escape after violence motivated by something other than theft, no robbery occurred. DeJesus v. State, 98 So. 3d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), confirms that defendants are entitled to a special “afterthought” jury instruction when the evidence supports it.

A related defense is claim of right. Florida recognizes that a forcible taking under a bona fide claim of right is not robbery if the accused had a good-faith belief that they owned the property or were entitled to immediate possession of it. This often comes up in disputes over loaned items, drug debts (which present their own complications), and personal property arguments that turn physical.

Constitutional Motions to Suppress

Many armed robbery cases are won on motion practice before they ever reach a jury. Suppressing a single piece of evidence can collapse the case.

• Fourth Amendment. Challenges to the legality of stops, searches, and seizures of clothing, firearms, vehicles, phones, and stolen property. If the firearm was found through an illegal search, it cannot be used at trial.
• Fifth Amendment. Challenges to statements made without proper Miranda warnings or under coercive interrogation conditions. The Innocence Project of Florida reports that more than 25% of wrongful convictions overturned by DNA evidence involved false confessions, admissions, or statements to law enforcement.
• Sixth Amendment. Challenges to violations of the right to counsel, including statements taken after the right attached, and Confrontation Clause challenges to surrogate or uncross-examined witness testimony under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004).

When we work an armed robbery case, motions to suppress are usually drafted in the first 60 to 90 days. Suppression of an identification, a confession, or the firearm itself can convert a life-exposure case into a dismissal or a substantially reduced plea.

Duress and Coercion

Duress is available when the accused participated under an imminent and well-grounded threat of serious harm, with no reasonable opportunity to escape. It comes up most often in cases involving co-defendants, gang involvement, or human trafficking situations. It is a narrow defense and requires careful corroboration, but in the right facts it can be decisive.

What Realistic Outcomes Look Like

It would be dishonest to write about armed robbery defense without addressing the reality of how these cases actually resolve. According to BJS case-processing data and the ABA Plea Bargain Task Force, the vast majority of felony cases in the United States resolve by guilty plea, not by trial. The ABA Task Force’s 2023 report concluded that nearly 98% of criminal convictions come from guilty pleas.

That statistic should not push anyone into accepting a plea reflexively. Trial-level preparation is what creates the leverage to negotiate something better than the 10-year mandatory floor. Vera Institute research on plea bargaining documents that a real “trial penalty” exists, with custodial sentences imposed at trial running substantially longer than sentences imposed through plea agreements. That trial penalty means trial is a real option only when the case is genuinely defensible. When it is, the defense should be ready.

Realistic outcomes in armed robbery cases generally fall into one of these categories:

• Dismissal through successful motions to suppress or motions to dismiss under Rule 3.190(c)(4), particularly when the firearm or identification is excluded
• Charge reduction to robbery with a weapon (no 10-20-Life), simple robbery, grand theft, or robbery by sudden snatching, restoring judicial sentencing discretion
• Youthful Offender sentencing under Florida Statute 958.04 for defendants under 21, capping incarceration at 4 years and the total sentence at 6 years (a critical leverage point we discuss in our overview of Youthful Offender sentencing in Florida)
• Acquittal at trial when the identification, weapon element, or specific intent is genuinely contestable
• Negotiated plea to a non-mandatory disposition when the facts cannot support reduction to a lesser charge but the defense can show pre-trial weaknesses

The Youthful Offender option is worth a special mention. If the accused was under 21 at the time of sentencing, with no prior YO designation, and the conviction is for a non-life felony (which includes robbery with a weapon but not robbery with a firearm sentenced as a life felony), Youthful Offender sentencing allows the prosecutor to waive 10-20-Life entirely. That single statutory tool has changed the trajectory of more young defendants’ lives than almost any other plea-stage move available.

Why Early Attorney Involvement Matters More in Armed Robbery Cases

In most criminal cases, hiring an attorney quickly is helpful. In armed robbery, it is decisive. Here is why.

Pre-file advocacy. Between the arrest and the State Attorney’s filing decision (typically 21 to 33 days), the prosecutor is making the single most consequential decision in the case: what to charge. A defense attorney working that window can present evidence the police did not have, raise legal issues the assigned prosecutor may not have considered, and influence whether the firearm enhancement, the deadly-weapon enhancement, or the case itself is filed.

Evidence preservation. Surveillance video at gas stations, restaurants, and apartments is overwritten in 14 to 30 days. Cell phone data has retention windows. Witnesses’ memories degrade. The first two weeks are when defense investigation is most productive.

Identification challenges. The earlier we get into a case, the more we can do to challenge a suggestive showup, demand a fair lineup procedure, or prevent a contaminated identification from hardening into the witness’s permanent recollection.

The mandatory-minimum problem. Because only the prosecutor can waive 10-20-Life, the negotiation that matters is functionally with the State Attorney’s Office, not the judge. That negotiation is most effective when defense counsel is in early enough to influence the charge before it is filed.

This is the mechanical reason the Tampa Violent Crime Lawyer page and the Tampa Gun Crimes Lawyer page on our website both emphasize 24/7 availability. The first 72 hours after an arrest are when surveillance footage is still recoverable, witnesses are still reachable, and the State Attorney’s filing decision is still in motion.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the minimum sentence for armed robbery in Florida?

If a firearm was carried during the robbery, the mandatory minimum is 10 years under Florida’s 10-20-Life law. If the firearm was discharged, the minimum is 20 years. If anyone was injured or killed, the minimum is 25 years to life. Only the prosecutor can waive these minimums.

Can a BB gun count as a firearm in Florida armed robbery cases?

Not as a firearm under Florida Statute 790.001, but it can still qualify as a “weapon” or “deadly weapon” depending on the facts. The Florida Supreme Court held in Dale v. State that whether an unloaded BB gun is a deadly weapon is a jury question. If the state cannot prove the object was an actual firearm, the charge often drops from robbery with a firearm (life felony, 10-year mandatory) to robbery with a weapon (first-degree felony, 30-year max, no mandatory).

What if I did not actually have a weapon during the alleged robbery?

If the state cannot prove possession of a weapon, the proper charge is strong-arm robbery (a second-degree felony with a 15-year maximum) or, in some fact patterns, theft. Butler v. State is the key case: the appellate court reversed an armed robbery conviction and directed entry of judgment for unarmed robbery when the state could not prove the defendant actually possessed a weapon.

Can armed robbery charges be reduced or dropped before trial?

Yes, and this is where most of the meaningful defense work happens. Successful motions to suppress (of an identification, a confession, or the firearm) can collapse the case entirely. Charge reductions to robbery with a weapon, simple robbery, or grand theft remove the 10-20-Life floor. Pre-file advocacy can sometimes prevent the firearm enhancement from being filed in the first place.

Should I talk to police if I am being investigated for armed robbery?

No. Invoke your right to remain silent and your right to counsel, and do it clearly and out loud. The Florida Innocence Commission’s data on false confessions, combined with the legal architecture of Miranda, makes this the single highest-leverage decision a person under investigation can make. There is no upside to giving a statement. Wait for an attorney.

How long does an armed robbery case take to resolve in Florida?

Felony defendants are entitled to be brought to trial within 175 days under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191. The Florida Supreme Court restructured this rule effective July 1, 2025: the speedy trial clock now starts when formal charges are filed (not at arrest), the recapture period grew from 10 days to 30 days, and recapture is now mandatory in all cases. In practice, armed robbery cases often take 9 to 18 months to resolve, longer if a trial is set.

How The Brancato Law Firm Approaches Armed Robbery Cases

We handle armed robbery cases the way we handle homicide cases: with full forensic preparation from day one. Our managing partner, Rocky Brancato, served as Chief Operations Officer of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office, where he led the largest criminal defense operation in Tampa Bay. He understands charging policies, mandatory-minimum dynamics, and the State Attorney’s filing process from the leadership level. He has tried 150+ jury trials to verdict and is death-qualified, a credential reflecting the rigorous standards required for the most serious criminal matters.

Our published armed robbery results include a not-guilty verdict on armed robbery with a firearm (two counts) where mistaken-identity defense was built around hands-on examination of the evidence and cross-examination of the investigating detectives, and a not-guilty verdict on a separate armed robbery case where we exposed the victim’s failure to mention a distinctive arm tattoo when describing the suspect. Each case is unique, and past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

We ensure every client receives thorough preparation. We provide upfront, flat-fee pricing on every case, with payment plans available. Free, confidential consultations are available 24/7 by phone.

If you or a family member has been arrested for armed robbery, robbery with a firearm, or robbery with a deadly weapon in Hillsborough, Pinellas, or Pasco County, the next 72 hours matter more than the next 72 days. Call (813) 727-7159 for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will give you a straight answer about your case, the realistic range of outcomes, and what early defense work can do to change the trajectory.