I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm. I am a member of the National College for DUI Defense, and after a crash that sends a driver to the hospital, the fight over the medical file — and the blood-alcohol result inside it — is often the fight over the entire case. Our attorneys litigate these subpoenas before the records are ever produced.

Are Medical Records Private in Florida?

Yes — and the protection is stronger than most people realize, because it is constitutional. Florida courts have long recognized that individuals enjoy a right of privacy in their medical records under article I, section 23 of the Florida Constitution. That right is not absolute, but it yields only to a compelling governmental interest, and in a criminal investigation the State establishes that interest only by showing a clear connection between suspected illegal activity and the person whose privacy it wants to invade.

On top of the constitutional right sit two statutes. Section 395.3025, Florida Statutes, makes hospital patient records confidential and forbids disclosure without your consent — with a narrow exception in subsection (4)(d) allowing disclosure in a civil or criminal action “upon the issuance of a subpoena from a court of competent jurisdiction and proper notice by the party seeking such records to the patient or his or her legal representative.” Section 401.30, Florida Statutes, gives similar confidentiality to emergency medical services and ambulance records. The State cannot simply ask the hospital for your file; it must go through a judge, and it must tell you first.

What Must the State Prove to Subpoena Your Records?

The State must show a nexus between the records it wants and a material issue in the investigation — and Florida’s Second District, whose decisions govern Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties, has broken that burden into two parts. In Leka v. State, 283 So. 3d 853 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019), a driver was hospitalized after a crash and prosecutors sought his hospital records before any charge had even been filed; the court held the State must (1) identify a theory that reasonably makes the records relevant and (2) produce some evidence making it reasonable to expect the records will support that theory. Because the State offered only vague testimony, never introduced the accident report, and never even identified which records it wanted, the Second District quashed the subpoena order.

Leka also teaches what the State can rely on when it does its homework: the court acknowledged that a judge may look to the State’s argument together with the accident report or the probable cause affidavit to establish relevance. The difference between a subpoena that survives and one that gets quashed is usually whether the State actually put that supporting material in front of the judge — and whether anyone was there holding it to that burden.

What Did the Roberts and Savage Decisions Say?

The Sixth District’s decision in Roberts v. State, 405 So. 3d 383 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023) is the sharpest statement of the State’s burden. Scott Roberts was under DUI investigation, and at the hearing on the State’s motion to subpoena his medical records, the prosecutor presented no evidence at all — just argument referring to the motion itself, which was unsworn, and attachments that were unsigned and unsworn. The court held that argument referring to unsworn paperwork is not evidence, granted certiorari, and quashed the subpoena order — adding that improper disclosure of records protected by sections 395.3025 and 401.30 is an injury that can never be undone on appeal.

Then, on August 3, 2026, the same court decided Savage v. State, No. 6D26-1612 (Fla. 6th DCA Aug. 3, 2026), a certiorari petition challenging a medical-records subpoena order out of Collier County. The court denied the petition in a single line — but the authorities it lined up against each other tell the real story. On one side, its own Roberts decision, requiring actual evidence of the nexus; on the other, McKnight v. State, 335 So. 3d 190 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022), and State v. Tavenese, 321 So. 3d 252 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021), both stating that a court may rely on the State’s argument and the accident report or probable cause affidavit. How much proof the State must actually bring to the hearing remains contested ground across Florida’s districts — which means these hearings are winnable, and worth fighting, right now.

Do You Get Notified Before the State Takes Your Records?

Yes — notice is a statutory requirement, and it is your opening to fight back. Section 395.3025(4)(d) conditions disclosure on “proper notice by the party seeking such records to the patient or his or her legal representative.” That notice exists so you can object before the hospital hands anything over: through counsel, you can contest the State’s showing at the hearing, and if the trial court gets it wrong, seek immediate review by petition for writ of certiorari — the route taken in Leka, Roberts, and Savage. Appellate courts accept these petitions precisely because, as Roberts put it, once private medical information is disclosed, the harm cannot be remedied later.

That is also why speed matters more here than almost anywhere else in a DUI case. The window to object runs from notice to the hearing date. A driver who waits until arraignment to hire counsel has usually let the single best suppression opportunity in the case pass unopposed.

How Is a Records Subpoena Different From a Blood Draw?

September 2026 update: The blood-draw side of this comparison has just been clarified. In State v. Marlin, No. 4D2025-1448 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 2, 2026), the Fourth District affirmed suppression of a forced blood draw in a fatal Turnpike crash, held that the natural dissipation of alcohol is never a per se exigency, and receded from the “probable cause” language in State v. Acevedo that prosecutors had been treating as an exception to the warrant requirement. Absent actual consent or case-specific exigent circumstances, a warrant is required — regardless of Florida’s implied consent law. Our full analysis is in can police take your blood without a warrant in Florida.

They are entirely different legal events, governed by different rules — and defending a hospital-crash DUI means fighting both. A law-enforcement blood draw is taken by or at the direction of police under Florida’s implied-consent framework, and it is attacked through the Fourth Amendment: warrant, consent, or true exigency. Medical blood is different: the hospital drew it for treatment, the results sit in your patient file, and the State’s only lawful path to them is the subpoena process described on this page. We cover the law-enforcement draw — and the recent appellate scrutiny it has received — in our guides to DUI manslaughter in Florida and how DUI manslaughter cases are defended.

The practical consequence: after a serious crash, the State often has no admissible blood evidence unless it wins the subpoena hearing. That hearing — held while you are still recovering, often before charges are filed — can decide whether the most damaging number in the case ever reaches a jury.

When Does This Fight Happen — Before or After Charges?

Usually before. In crash cases with injuries, the State frequently seeks hospital records during the investigation, weeks or months before any charging decision — Leka involved a subpoena sought before a single citation had been issued. That timing creates a trap: many drivers assume that because they have not been charged, they do not need a lawyer yet. In reality, the pre-charge window is when the decisive privacy fight happens, and it is also when defense counsel can engage prosecutors before momentum builds — the same early-intervention approach our attorneys use across serious traffic cases like vehicular homicide.

How Do We Defend Against a Medical Records Subpoena?

We litigate the State’s burden element by element. Is there a genuine theory of relevance, or boilerplate? Did the State bring evidence — an accident report, a sworn affidavit, testimony — or just argument, which Roberts holds is not enough? Is the requested scope limited to the crash, or a fishing expedition through your medical history? Was the statutory notice proper? And if the trial court signs off anyway, we evaluate immediate certiorari review, where the standard — a departure from the essential requirements of the law causing irreparable harm — is exactly what these cases involve. If records were already produced, the fight shifts to excluding them and everything derived from them.

Because I am an NCDD member and our attorneys handle hospital-crash DUI cases across Tampa Bay, we also read the medical file the State wants with a defense eye: trauma-room blood results are measured on serum, not whole blood, and the difference — along with chain-of-custody and conversion disputes — gives a second layer of defense even when records come in.

Frequently Asked Questions About Medical Records in Florida DUI Cases

Can police just ask the hospital for my blood results?

No. Hospital records are confidential under section 395.3025, Florida Statutes, and protected by Florida’s constitutional right of privacy, so the State needs a court-issued subpoena and proper notice to you before the hospital may disclose them in a criminal matter. A disclosure outside that process is itself a ground for relief. Our attorneys check exactly how the State obtained every medical record in the file.

Does a DUI crash automatically give the State access to my records?

No. A crash plus a hospital visit is not, by itself, a nexus. Under Leka v. State, 283 So. 3d 853 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) — the controlling decision in the Tampa Bay area — the State must offer a theory of relevance and evidence supporting it, such as documented impairment indicators, and the court must consider the scope of what is requested.

What happens at the subpoena hearing?

The State presents its justification, and the defense can contest it — that is where cases like Roberts are won, because argument alone is not evidence. If the judge grants the subpoena anyway, the ruling can be challenged immediately by petition for writ of certiorari rather than waiting for a trial. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. treats this hearing as the first suppression battle of the case.

I got a notice that the State wants my hospital records. How long do I have?

Act immediately — your opportunity to object runs from the notice to the hearing, and once records are disclosed the harm cannot be undone, which is exactly why appellate courts allow emergency review in these cases. Call (813) 727-7159 as soon as the notice arrives, before the hearing date, so counsel can appear and put the State to its burden.

Can the State get records from before the crash?

The scope of the subpoena is part of the State’s burden. Courts evaluating these requests consider whether the records sought are connected to the issues in the investigation, and Leka faulted the State for never even identifying which records it wanted. Overbroad requests reaching into unrelated medical history are a primary target when we contest these subpoenas.

What if my records were already turned over?

The fight is not over. Improperly obtained records can be challenged through certiorari and suppression litigation, and how the blood was analyzed — hospital serum values versus legal whole-blood standards — remains contestable even for records that come in. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. reviews both the legality of the disclosure and the science inside the file; call (813) 727-7159 for a free, confidential review.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Hillsborough County Criminal Defense Attorney page.

Related reading: What Is DUI in Florida? · What Is DUI Manslaughter in Florida? · How DUI Manslaughter Cases Are Defended in Florida · What Is Vehicular Homicide in Florida?

The Most Important Hearing in Your DUI Case May Happen Before You’re Charged

If you were hospitalized after a crash in Hillsborough, Pinellas, or Pasco County and the State wants your medical records, the hearing on that subpoena may decide your case before a charge is ever filed. Call the attorneys of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. — founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato — at (813) 727-7159 the day the notice arrives, because once your records are disclosed, no court can make them private again.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

What Is Trenton’s Law?

On October 1, 2025, a sweeping new Florida law known as Trenton’s Law took effect, fundamentally changing how DUI and BUI offenses are prosecuted and punished in Florida. This legislation represents one of the most significant expansions of DUI penalties in recent Florida history.

Specifically, Trenton’s Law accomplishes four major objectives: it criminalizes refusal to submit to chemical testing, enhances penalties for repeat offenders, increases sentencing for DUI and BUI manslaughter, and updates Florida’s Criminal Punishment Code to impose higher sentencing points for impaired driving offenses. Consequently, anyone arrested for DUI or BUI after October 1, 2025 faces substantially more severe consequences than under prior law.

Breath Test Refusal Is Now a Crime

One of the most significant changes under Trenton’s Law is the criminalization of breath and urine test refusal. Prior to October 1, 2025, refusing a lawful request for chemical testing resulted in an administrative license suspension but was not itself a criminal offense.

Under the new law, refusing to submit to testing now carries the following criminal penalties:

Moreover, officers must now clearly advise drivers that refusing a lawful test is not only grounds for license suspension but also a crime that can be prosecuted. This expanded implied consent warning ensures defendants cannot claim ignorance of the criminal consequences.

Enhanced DUI and BUI Manslaughter Penalties

Trenton’s Law dramatically increases penalties for DUI manslaughter, BUI manslaughter, vehicular homicide, and vessel homicide—particularly for defendants with prior convictions. Under the new law, these offenses are now elevated to first-degree felonies when the defendant has a prior conviction for any of these offenses.

Prior Convictions That Trigger Enhancement

A defendant’s current charge will be elevated to a first-degree felony if they have any prior conviction for:

• DUI manslaughter (Florida Statute § 316.193(3)(c)3)
• BUI manslaughter (Florida Statute § 327.35(3)(c)3)
• Vehicular homicide (Florida Statute § 782.071)
• Vessel homicide (Florida Statute § 782.072)

Trenton’s Law: Before and After Comparison

Offense Severity Ranking Changes

Trenton’s Law also updates Florida’s Offense Severity Ranking Chart under the Criminal Punishment Code. DUI, BUI, vehicular homicide, and vessel homicide offenses have been moved higher on the chart, resulting in significantly more sentencing points.

In Florida’s sentencing system, higher offense severity rankings translate directly into longer mandatory minimum sentences and increased prison exposure. Therefore, even defendants without prior convictions will face harsher guideline sentences for DUI and BUI offenses committed after October 1, 2025.

Boating Under the Influence (BUI) Enhancements

Trenton’s Law applies identical enhancements to boating under the influence offenses. For Tampa Bay area boaters—including those in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco counties—this means that BUI arrests now carry the same serious consequences as DUI arrests.

Specifically, the law provides that:

• Refusing breath or urine testing during a BUI investigation is now a criminal offense
• BUI manslaughter with a prior conviction for DUI manslaughter, BUI manslaughter, vehicular homicide, or vessel homicide is a first-degree felony
• Vessel homicide carries enhanced sentencing points under the Criminal Punishment Code

What Trenton’s Law Means for Tampa Bay Drivers and Boaters

For drivers and boaters across Tampa Bay—including Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco counties—Trenton’s Law significantly raises the stakes in DUI and BUI cases. The changes affect everyone from first-time offenders to those with prior records.

A refusal to blow is no longer just an administrative suspension—it can now lead to a permanent criminal record. Likewise, repeat DUI or BUI offenders face life-altering felony enhancements that can result in decades of prison time.

If you or a loved one is charged under this new law, it is crucial to work with an experienced defense attorney who understands both the criminal trial process and the nuances of Florida’s sentencing guidelines.

Frequently Asked Questions: Trenton’s Law

What is Trenton’s Law in Florida?

Trenton’s Law is a 2025 Florida statute that significantly increases penalties for DUI and BUI offenses. The law criminalizes breath test refusal, enhances penalties for repeat offenders, elevates DUI and BUI manslaughter to first-degree felonies for defendants with prior convictions, and increases sentencing points under Florida’s Criminal Punishment Code. It takes effect October 1, 2025.

Does refusing a breath test now carry criminal charges in Florida?

Yes. Under Trenton’s Law, refusing to submit to a lawful breath or urine test is now a criminal offense. A first refusal is a second-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to 60 days in jail and a $500 fine. A second or subsequent refusal is a first-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail and a $1,000 fine.

What happens if someone with a prior DUI manslaughter conviction causes another fatal crash?

Under Trenton’s Law, they can now be charged with a first-degree felony, which carries a maximum penalty of 30 years in state prison. This is a dramatic increase from the previous second-degree felony classification, which carried a maximum of 15 years.

Does Trenton’s Law apply to boating under the influence (BUI)?

Yes. The law applies identical enhancements to BUI offenses. Refusing testing during a BUI investigation is now a criminal offense, and BUI manslaughter with a prior conviction is now a first-degree felony. Vessel homicide also receives enhanced sentencing points.

When does Trenton’s Law take effect?

Trenton’s Law takes effect on October 1, 2025. All DUI and BUI arrests occurring on or after this date will be subject to the new enhanced penalties, including criminal charges for refusal.

Should I refuse the breath test under the new law?

This is a complex legal question that depends on your specific circumstances. Under Trenton’s Law, refusal now carries criminal penalties in addition to license suspension—but providing a breath sample can also provide evidence for the prosecution. An experienced DUI attorney can help you understand the strategic considerations based on your individual situation.

What prior convictions trigger the first-degree felony enhancement?

The first-degree felony enhancement applies if the defendant has any prior conviction for DUI manslaughter, BUI manslaughter, vehicular homicide, or vessel homicide. Any one of these prior convictions will elevate a new DUI manslaughter, BUI manslaughter, vehicular homicide, or vessel homicide charge to a first-degree felony.

How can a Tampa DUI attorney help with charges under Trenton’s Law?

An experienced Tampa DUI attorney can challenge the legality of the traffic stop, question the administration of field sobriety tests, challenge breath test results, file motions to suppress evidence, negotiate with prosecutors for reduced charges, and advocate for alternative sentencing. Given the enhanced penalties under Trenton’s Law, aggressive defense from the earliest stages is critical.

Related:

• Tampa DUI Lawyer – Full DUI defense services
• Tampa CDL DUI Suspension Attorney – Commercial license defense
• Retrograde Extrapolation: Challenging BAC Evidence in Florida DUI Cases
• Tampa Boating Law 2025 Lucy’s Law