If a detective has asked you to come in and “clear things up,” or you already gave a statement that does not match what happened, the next few days decide how much that interview will cost you. I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm. I taught criminal procedure and courtroom testimony as a police academy instructor, then tried homicide, sex crime, and child abuse cases in the Major Crimes Unit, and I have taken more than 150 jury trials to verdict. Our attorneys use that training to take interrogation recordings apart minute by minute and to build the suppression motions and trial cross-examination that follow.

What is a false confession, and how common are false confessions?

A false confession is an admission to a crime the person did not commit, usually produced by the pressure and suggestion of a police interrogation. In 2025, 19 of the 97 exonerations recorded by the National Registry of Exonerations, or 20%, included a false confession, according to the Registry’s 2025 Annual Report of the National Registry of Exonerations, published in April 2026. The Registry counts 3,767 exonerations in the United States from 1989 through the end of 2025.

DNA cases show an even higher rate. A 2025 scientific review by seven researchers, Kassin et al., “Police-Induced Confessions, 2.0: Risk Factors and Recommendations,” Law and Human Behavior (2025), reports that false confessions contributed to nearly 30% of DNA exonerations in the United States. That review updates a 2010 white paper on the same subject, also published in Law and Human Behavior, and collects the research on why innocent people confess.

Sex crime cases are where a false confession does the most damage. Many sex abuse cases come down to one person’s word against another’s, with little physical evidence, so the defendant’s own statement often becomes the center of the State’s case. That is why our Tampa sex crimes lawyer team treats the interrogation recording as the most important piece of evidence in the file.

Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm use these benchmarks when we time-stamp a client’s interrogation. A session that runs many times longer than the norm is one of the first facts we put in front of the judge.

What interrogation tactics are legal in Florida, and which ones cross the line?

Florida police may lie to a suspect about the evidence, but they may not show the suspect fabricated documents, combine threats of harsher punishment with promises of leniency, or keep questioning after a clear request for a lawyer. Each of those limits comes from a specific court decision, and each one gives the defense a concrete argument in a motion to suppress.

The baseline rule comes from Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731 (1969). Police falsely told Frazier that his companion had already confessed. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the lie was relevant to whether the confession was voluntary but was not enough, by itself, to throw the confession out.

Florida drew a firm line in State v. Cayward, 552 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Detectives suspected a 19-year-old of sexually assaulting and smothering his five-year-old niece but did not think they had enough evidence to charge him. With the knowledge of the State Attorney’s Office, they fabricated two scientific reports on official-looking letterhead showing that semen on the child’s underwear came from him, and they showed the reports to him to get a confession. The Second District Court of Appeal, the appellate court for Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties, affirmed suppression of the confession and held that manufacturing false documents violates due process. The lesson from State v. Cayward, 552 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) is practical: a spoken bluff is usually allowed, and a fake lab report is not.

Threats paired with promises can also make a confession involuntary. In Brewer v. State, 386 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 1980), detectives told the suspect he faced the electric chair or life in prison if convicted of first-degree murder and said they would help him toward a second-degree outcome if he confessed. The Florida Supreme Court held the confession coerced and ordered a new trial.

The tactic our firm sees most in Tampa-area sex investigations is minimization. In statutory cases, a detective will offer a version of “I know you didn’t rape her,” which gives the suspect an escape from the worst accusation. The suspect then admits consensual contact, which is still a felony under section 800.04 of the Florida Statutes when the other person is under 16, because that statute makes consent no defense. The 2025 Kassin review reports that minimization raises the risk of a false confession compared with direct questioning.

What happened in the 16-hour Clearwater interrogation in State v. Sawyer?

A trial judge suppressed a murder confession after Clearwater Police Department detectives questioned Tom Sawyer for about 16 hours, and the Second District affirmed in State v. Sawyer, 561 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). The interrogation ran from about 4:10 p.m. on a Thursday to 9:30 a.m. the next morning. Police did not give Miranda warnings until about four hours in, then ignored two requests for a lawyer and kept going after Sawyer said he no longer wanted to talk and needed to sleep.

Police also charged Sawyer with sexual battery. The State later dropped that charge because the sexual battery details, which detectives had supplied and suggested to him during questioning, turned out to be false. The trial judge heard six weeks of testimony from 47 witnesses, listened to roughly 16 hours of tape, and found the statements were the product of psychological coercion.

The evergreen lesson from State v. Sawyer, 561 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) is that the recording won the motion, because it let the judge hear exactly who introduced each fact. Our attorneys handle cases in Pinellas County and across Tampa Bay, and we build every confession challenge the same way: by tracing each detail in the statement back to the person who said it first.

How do controlled phone calls work in Florida sex crime investigations?

A controlled call is a recorded phone call that the accuser or a family member places to the suspect at a detective’s direction, hoping the suspect will admit something. Section 934.03(2)(c), Florida Statutes, makes the recording lawful when a person acting under police direction is a party to the call or one party consents, and the purpose is to obtain evidence of a crime.

Miranda warnings usually do not apply to a controlled call. In Illinois v. Perkins, 496 U.S. 292 (1990), an undercover officer posing as a fellow inmate questioned a jailed suspect, and the U.S. Supreme Court held no warnings were required because a suspect who does not know he is talking to police feels none of the custodial pressure Miranda addresses. The same reasoning applies when the suspect thinks he is talking only to the accuser.

Recordings made without police direction follow different rules. In McDade v. State, 154 So. 3d 292 (Fla. 2014), a 16-year-old in Lee County secretly recorded her stepfather in his bedroom with an MP3 player hidden in her shirt. The Florida Supreme Court held the recordings inadmissible under section 934.06 of the Florida Statutes and ordered a new trial. Florida law now includes an exception in section 934.03(2)(k) that lets a child under 18 record a conversation when the child has reasonable grounds to believe it will capture a statement about an unlawful sexual act or violence against the child.

Controlled call admissions are often weaker than they sound. The suspect is usually talking to someone he loves or wants to calm down, and a line like “I’m sorry you feel that way” can be played to a jury as a confession. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm request the full recording, every attempt to reach the suspect, and any notes on what the caller was told to say. Because a controlled call usually happens before an arrest, it is often the first sign that someone is under investigation, and that is the point where representation before charges are filed can do the most good.

Why is a confession more dangerous in a Florida sex abuse case?

A confession is more dangerous in a Florida sex abuse case because section 92.565 lets the State use it even when the State cannot independently prove that a crime happened. Florida courts ordinarily require some proof of the crime apart from the defendant’s own words, a rule called corpus delicti, which exists in part to guard against false confessions.

Section 92.565, Florida Statutes, creates an exception for sexual abuse charges, including sexual battery and lewd or lascivious offenses. A judge must hold a hearing outside the jury’s presence. The confession must be memorialized, the court must find the State is unable to show each element of the crime, and the State must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that corroborating evidence tends to show the statement is trustworthy. Hearsay is allowed at that hearing, and the judge must make specific findings on the record. Factors include whether the alleged victim was under 12 or physically or mentally incapacitated.

Our attorneys treat the section 92.565 hearing as a second suppression hearing. It is a separate chance to show the judge that the “corroboration” came from the detective’s own questions. Our post on Florida’s confession without corpus exception in sex crimes cases walks through that hearing in detail.

How do our attorneys challenge a false confession?

Our attorneys challenge a false confession with a six-step process that starts with the recording and ends, if necessary, in front of the jury.

1. Collect every recording and time-stamp it. We obtain the full audio and video, the officers’ reports, and any notes, and we log when questioning started, every break, and when warnings were given. Florida has no statute that requires police to record an entire interrogation, while about 30 states now require video recording for some or all crimes, according to the 2025 Kassin review. An unrecorded stretch of questioning is a gap the State has to explain.
2. Trace every fact to its source. We mark each detail in the confession and find who said it first. In one of our cases, a client faced serious sex crime charges after a marathon interrogation, and the review showed that every specific detail in his “confession” came from the detective’s leading questions. The statement held nothing that only the true perpetrator would know.
3. Test the Miranda warnings and the waiver. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), requires warnings before custodial interrogation. I taught Miranda requirements at the police academy, so I read a waiver form the way the officer was trained to present it, and I know where the shortcuts usually happen.
4. Bring in a forensic psychologist. An expert can test for suggestibility, intellectual limits, and mental illness, and can explain interrogation pressure to the judge. A jury hears that testimony only if the judge finds it meets Florida’s expert standard in section 90.702 of the Florida Statutes. Our post on why expert witnesses matter in major criminal cases explains how we choose them.
5. File the motion to suppress. We file and argue these motions in the Hillsborough County Courthouse and other Tampa Bay courts, and our guide to motions to suppress evidence in Tampa covers the procedure. For cases in Hillsborough County, a strong motion can also shift plea negotiations before the hearing is ever held.
6. Try the confession if it comes in. If the judge denies the motion, we put the interrogation itself in front of the jury, as the next section explains.

Are teenagers and people with mental illness more likely to falsely confess?

Yes. Teenagers and people with mental illness or intellectual limits are more vulnerable to false confession because they are more suggestible and more eager to end the questioning. The 2025 Kassin review cites a study in which 17% of youthful detainees said they had falsely confessed to police.

Florida courts give juvenile waivers extra scrutiny. In Ramirez v. State, 739 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1999), detectives questioned a 17-year-old with little justice-system experience, gave Miranda warnings only after he had made significant admissions, and told him the warnings would not change his desire to cooperate. His parents had no chance to see him. The Florida Supreme Court held the waiver invalid, listing factors that include how the warnings were given, the suspect’s age and intelligence, whether parents were contacted, and where the questioning took place.

Our firm used those factors in a case involving a 14-year-old with bipolar disorder who was questioned near midnight by two detectives. A forensic psychologist concluded the confession was not knowingly and voluntarily given, and the felony sex charges were reduced to misdemeanor battery. The full story is in our case study, When a Confession Is Not a Confession.

Does a confession still matter if the judge denies the motion to suppress?

Yes, but the defense can still attack it in front of the jury. In Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683 (1986), a 16-year-old said he had been held in a windowless room, surrounded by as many as six officers, and refused permission to call his mother. The trial judge found the confession voluntary and then barred the jury from hearing about those conditions. The U.S. Supreme Court reversed, holding that a defendant may present evidence about the physical and psychological circumstances of a confession because its credibility is for the jury to decide.

Under Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683 (1986), losing the suppression motion moves the fight to a new stage. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm play the key portions of the recording for the jury, cross-examine the detective on every leading question, and show where the confession contradicts the physical evidence.

What should you do if a Tampa detective wants to talk about a sex crime allegation?

Tell the detective you will not answer questions without a lawyer, say it in plain words, and call a defense attorney before any interview or callback. Sawyer’s first request for a lawyer was unclear, and the case shows how much turns on the exact words a suspect uses.

1. Do not discuss the allegation by phone, text, or social media with the accuser or the accuser’s family. The call may be a controlled call.
2. Say it clearly: “I want a lawyer, and I do not want to answer questions.”
3. Do not agree to “just come in and give your side.”
4. Write down every contact: the date, the time, who called, and what was said.
5. Call a lawyer, who can contact the detective for you.

Our article on what to do after being arrested in Tampa covers the next steps if an arrest has already happened. The Brancato Law Firm can step in at either stage.

What results has our firm obtained in confession cases?

Our firm has defeated confessions in sex crime cases by showing how police obtained them.

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. More outcomes are listed on our case results page.

Frequently asked questions about false confessions in Florida sex crime cases

Can police lie to you during an interrogation in Florida?

Yes, Florida police may lie about the evidence during questioning, and that lie alone usually does not make a confession inadmissible, though fabricated documents cross the line under State v. Cayward, 552 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). The Brancato Law Firm reviews every recording for the moment a bluff turned into a fake report, a threat, or a promise of leniency.

Is it legal for police to record a controlled phone call in Florida?

Yes, section 934.03(2)(c) of the Florida Statutes, allows police, or a person acting at their direction, to record a call when one party consents and the purpose is to gather evidence of a crime. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm demand the full recording, every attempt to reach the suspect, and the detective’s notes on what the caller was told to say.

Can a confession be thrown out if police never read me my Miranda rights?

It can, if you were in custody and being questioned when you made the statement. The Brancato Law Firm files motions to suppress unwarned statements, and our guide to suppressing confessions and other evidence in Tampa explains the process. A suppressed statement can still be used to impeach you if you testify differently at trial.

Can sex crime charges be dropped if the only real evidence is a confession?

Yes, particularly when the confession is suppressed or the judge finds it untrustworthy at a section 92.565 hearing and the State has little else. The Brancato Law Firm has had sex crime charges dismissed after showing that a client’s confession was built from details a detective supplied, and our sex crime defense attorneys in Tampa look for that pattern in every file.

What should I do if a detective asks me to come in and give my side of the story?

Decline the interview politely and ask the detective to contact your lawyer. The Brancato Law Firm can speak with the detective for you and, where it helps, provide evidence and context to detectives and prosecutors before a charging decision through pre-file advocacy.

Can a forensic psychologist help prove my confession was coerced?

Yes, a forensic psychologist can evaluate your vulnerabilities and the interrogation methods used, and that opinion can support a motion to suppress, though whether the expert also testifies before a jury depends on the judge’s ruling under section 90.702. In a case The Brancato Law Firm handled, a psychologist’s evaluation of a 14-year-old’s interrogation helped reduce felony sex charges to misdemeanor battery, as our coerced confession case study describes.

Does Florida require police to record interrogations?

No Florida statute requires police to record an entire custodial interrogation, although about 30 states now require video recording for some or all crimes. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm treat any unrecorded stretch of questioning as a gap the State must explain at the suppression hearing.

Where do you start if you already gave a statement?

Before you return a detective’s call, answer another message from the person accusing you, or agree to “one more conversation,” call The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. at (813) 727-7159. The firm was founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, and our attorneys will start by finding out what police already have, including any controlled call, so you do not walk into another interview blind. Recordings and call records are easiest to request and preserve early, so call us at any hour.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Sex Crimes Defense page.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.