I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm. I have served as a police academy legal instructor teaching officers the constitutional limits of search, seizure, and arrest, and I served as Chief Operating Officer of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office. Today our attorneys defend gun and drug charges across Tampa Bay, and this question — marijuana and guns — now sits at the center of one of the fastest-moving areas in criminal law.

What Does Federal Law Say About Marijuana Users and Guns?

Federal law makes it a crime for any person “who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” to possess a firearm or ammunition. That ban lives in 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), and because marijuana remains a controlled substance under federal law, it has always applied to marijuana users — including Florida’s hundreds of thousands of registered medical marijuana patients. A state card has never been a defense to the federal statute, because Florida’s medical marijuana program does not change what federal law says.

The federal ban shows up in a second place that trips up ordinary gun buyers: ATF Form 4473, the questionnaire every purchaser completes at a licensed dealer. The form asks directly whether you are an unlawful user of marijuana or any other controlled substance, and it warns that marijuana remains federally unlawful regardless of state medical programs. Answering falsely is a separate federal felony. Our attorneys have seen careful, law-abiding people put themselves in federal jeopardy with one checkbox — which is why the Supreme Court’s 2026 decision matters so much, and why it must be read carefully rather than treated as a green light.

What Did the Supreme Court Decide in United States v. Hemani?

In United States v. Hemani, No. 24-1234 (U.S. June 18, 2026), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the government’s prosecution of a regular marijuana user under § 922(g)(3) violated the Second Amendment — the first time the Court has struck down the application of a federal gun ban to drug users. Ali Hemani was prosecuted for having a gun in his home while being a regular marijuana user; the government’s theory was that regular use of a controlled substance, by itself, was enough to disarm him. It did not claim he was addicted, that he was high when found with the gun, or that he posed any particular danger.

Justice Gorsuch’s majority opinion, affirming the Fifth Circuit 7-2, rejected that theory under the historical-tradition test. The government leaned on founding-era “habitual drunkard” laws, but the Court found those laws targeted people whose drinking left them “practically incapacitated and incapable of managing their affairs” — not everyone who drank regularly. The Court also stressed how the modern statute operates: it “automatically divests an individual of his constitutional right to bear arms the moment he becomes an unlawful user . . . all without any pre-deprivation process,” while the historical laws required some proceeding — a conviction, a guardianship, a hearing — before anyone lost liberty. And the Court pointed out that the government’s own conduct undercuts the claim that all marijuana users are categorically dangerous: federal prosecutors have been directed to curtail enforcement against marijuana users, most states have legalized some use, and the government itself recently moved certain marijuana products down the federal schedules.

For Florida gun owners who hold medical marijuana cards, the practical takeaway is this: after Hemani, a federal prosecution built on nothing more than the fact that you regularly use marijuana is unconstitutional. That is a real shield. But it is a shield with defined edges, described next.

What Did Hemani Leave Undecided?

Hemani was an as-applied ruling, not a repeal — § 922(g)(3) is still on the books, and the Court expressly reserved several theories the government may still pursue. Anyone mixing marijuana and firearms in Florida should understand exactly where the line now sits.

That last row deserves emphasis. Nothing in Hemani changed the purchase paperwork. Until ATF revises Form 4473, a medical marijuana patient who answers “no” to the unlawful-user question is still committing a federal crime, whatever the Second Amendment now says about possession prosecutions. This is exactly the kind of trap where getting legal advice before you act is worth far more than defending a charge afterward.

Does a Florida Medical Marijuana Card Take Away Your Gun Rights?

No — holding a Florida medical marijuana card does not, by itself, disqualify you from owning or possessing a firearm under Florida law. Florida’s medical marijuana statute, Fla. Stat. § 381.986, created a physician-certification system with a patient registry, and nothing in Florida’s gun statutes makes registered patients prohibited possessors.

Florida’s concealed-carry licensing statute, Fla. Stat. § 790.06, does contain drug-related disqualifiers that patients should know about. The Department of Agriculture must deny a license to an applicant who “chronically and habitually uses alcoholic beverages or other substances to the extent that his or her normal faculties are impaired,” and to anyone found guilty of a chapter 893 drug crime within the three years before applying. A conviction for a controlled-substance offense also triggers revocation of an existing license. So while the card itself is not a disqualifier, a marijuana-related conviction — even a misdemeanor — can cost you your carry license for years.

Where Is Medical Marijuana Use Still Illegal Even With a Card?

A Florida medical marijuana card authorizes “medical use” — and the statute defines that term to exclude specific places, so using marijuana in the wrong location remains a crime even for a fully registered patient. Under § 381.986, “medical use” does not include using or administering marijuana on public transportation, in any public place, in an enclosed indoor workplace, on school grounds, or — critically for Tampa Bay’s boaters and drivers — “in a school bus, a vehicle, an aircraft, or a motorboat,” with a narrow exception for low-THC cannabis not in a form for smoking. A qualified patient who uses marijuana in plain view of the public or in a vehicle or boat commits a first-degree misdemeanor.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal enforced exactly this limit in Tanaka v. State, No. 6D2024-1581 (Fla. 6th DCA June 19, 2026), a Collier County case where the court affirmed a conviction by quoting the statute’s rule that “medical use” does not cover marijuana in a vehicle, aircraft, or motorboat. The lesson for the hundreds of thousands of Floridians with cards: your protection travels with the statute’s definitions, not with the card in your wallet. Smoking in your car — parked or moving — is outside the program, and once an officer smells it, you may face both the misdemeanor and a vehicle search. Our attorneys have litigated where the odor-of-cannabis doctrine now stands in the Tampa Bay area; see our analysis of Florida’s Second DCA limiting the plain-smell doctrine.

Can 18-to-20-Year-Olds Carry a Concealed Gun in Florida Now?

As of mid-2026, Florida’s ban on concealed-carry licenses for adults under 21 has been declared facially unconstitutional by one of Florida’s appellate courts — a major shift, though not yet a statewide settled rule. In Eubanks v. State, No. 4D2025-1698 (Fla. 4th DCA June 17, 2026), a Broward County prosecution for carrying a concealed firearm, the Fourth District held that § 790.06(2)(b) — which requires concealed-carry applicants to be 21 — “is facially unconstitutional as it relates to 18- to 20-year-olds.” The court reasoned that 18-to-20-year-olds are part of “the people” the Second Amendment protects, that the State produced no historical tradition of categorically disarming young adults, and — quoting the U.S. Supreme Court’s Rahimi decision — that a group cannot be “disarmed simply because he is not ‘responsible.’” The court reversed the young man’s conviction outright.

Two cautions before anyone under 21 straps on a holster. First, Eubanks is a Fourth District decision; Tampa, Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties sit in the Second District, which has not yet spoken, and the State may seek further review in the Florida Supreme Court. Second, the decision addressed concealed carry — it did not touch Florida’s open-carry ban or the separate federal rules for handgun purchases by under-21 buyers. Anyone in that age group facing a carry charge should treat Eubanks as a powerful defense to raise, not a settled right to rely on. For the broader landscape — permitless carry under Fla. Stat. § 790.01, where guns are still prohibited, and how gun charges are penalized — see our guide to gun crime laws in Florida.

How Do These Decisions Change a Florida Gun Charge Defense?

They add constitutional attacks to a defense toolbox that already starts with the Fourth Amendment. When our attorneys defend a Tampa Bay gun charge involving marijuana, the analysis now runs on three tracks at once.

1. Was the stop and search lawful? Most marijuana-and-gun cases begin with a traffic stop, a pat-down, or a search justified by the smell of cannabis. If the stop was unlawfully prolonged or the frisk exceeded its limits, the gun itself can be suppressed — see our breakdown of stop and frisk law in Florida.
2. Is the charge constitutional after Hemani and Eubanks? A federal § 922(g)(3) charge premised on use alone is now unconstitutional as applied. A state concealed-carry charge against an otherwise law-abiding 18-to-20-year-old is squarely challenged by Eubanks. These arguments are raised by motion — and where a district conflict exists, preserving the issue protects your appeal.
3. Does the statute even fit the facts? Was the marijuana “medical use” within § 381.986? Was the firearm actually “possessed”? Was a license exception satisfied? The State must prove every element, and pre-file advocacy — engaging the State Attorney’s Office before charges are formalized — can resolve borderline cases before they ever reach a courtroom.

What Should You Do If You Are Arrested on a Marijuana-Related Gun Charge?

Move fast, and say nothing about your marijuana use to anyone but your lawyer. Statements about how often you use — the exact fact that decides whether the government can build a lawful case after Hemani — are routinely volunteered in the first police interview, and they are admissible. In Hillsborough County, a felony gun arrest means booking at Orient Road Jail, first appearance within 24 hours, and formal charging decisions by the State Attorney’s Office in the weeks that follow. That charging window is where an early defense presentation can change everything: our attorneys use it to put suppression problems, Hemani and Eubanks issues, and medical-marijuana documentation in front of the prosecutor before the filing decision is made. If you were just arrested, our step-by-step guide to what to do after being arrested in Tampa walks through the first 72 hours.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Hillsborough County criminal defense page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I buy a gun in Florida if I have a medical marijuana card?

Florida law does not prohibit the purchase, but the federal purchase form still asks whether you are an unlawful user of marijuana, and marijuana remains federally unlawful even for state medical patients. Answering falsely on ATF Form 4473 is a federal felony that Hemani did not eliminate. Our attorneys advise cardholders on lawful paths before purchase, because this is far easier to get right in advance than to defend afterward.

Did the Supreme Court legalize gun ownership for all drug users?

No. United States v. Hemani, No. 24-1234 (U.S. June 18, 2026), held only that prosecuting a person for regular marijuana use alone violates the Second Amendment. The Court expressly left open prosecutions of people who are addicted, armed while presently intoxicated, or shown by individualized proof to be dangerous — and it did not touch the felon-in-possession ban.

Can I keep a gun in my car along with my medical marijuana?

Carrying a firearm in your vehicle can be lawful under Florida’s permitless-carry framework, but using marijuana in a vehicle is never “medical use” under Fla. Stat. § 381.986 — it is a first-degree misdemeanor even for cardholders. Combining the two also invites a search and a charging decision that treats you as an unlawful user. Keep the marijuana sealed, in its original packaging, and never use it in the car or on a boat.

Can an 18-year-old legally carry a concealed gun in Florida in 2026?

The Fourth District held in Eubanks v. State that the 21-and-over rule in § 790.06(2)(b) is facially unconstitutional, but that ruling comes from South Florida’s appellate district and the issue is not finally settled statewide. In Tampa Bay — the Second District — prosecutors may still file the charge, and the defense must raise Eubanks by motion. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. litigates these constitutional challenges and preserves them for appeal.

Will a marijuana conviction cost me my concealed weapons license?

Yes — a finding of guilt for a chapter 893 drug crime requires revocation of a Florida concealed-carry license, and it bars a new license for three years under Fla. Stat. § 790.06. That collateral consequence is one more reason to fight a “minor” possession charge rather than plead it out quickly. We routinely defend possession cases with the license consequences as a central goal.

Does Florida report medical marijuana patients to the federal government?

Florida’s medical marijuana use registry is a state system, and Florida law treats patient records as confidential; the registry is not a public list handed to federal authorities. But dispensary purchases, statements to police, and social media can all establish “unlawful user” status in a federal case. If you hold a card and own firearms, The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. can walk you through how the two programs actually interact.

Marijuana-and-gun law is moving faster right now than at any point in decades — Hemani and Eubanks both landed within a single week of June 2026, and the next round of decisions will decide how far they reach in Tampa Bay. If you are facing a gun or marijuana charge, or you hold a medical card and want to keep your gun rights intact, call the attorneys of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. — founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato — at (813) 727-7159 today. Constitutional defenses are strongest when they are raised before the State’s filing decision, not after.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm. I taught search and seizure at the police academy, and most of the gun cases our attorneys defend begin exactly there — with a stop, a frisk, or a car search that has to survive the Fourth Amendment before any gun charge can.

Can You Carry a Concealed Gun Without a Permit in Florida?

Yes — since July 1, 2023, Florida is a permitless-carry state. Under section 790.01, Florida Statutes, a person may carry a concealed weapon or firearm if they are either licensed or unlicensed but otherwise satisfy the criteria for receiving and keeping a concealed-carry license — essentially, an adult who could lawfully get the license may carry without ever applying for it.

The crimes that remain: a person who is unlicensed and ineligible for a license commits a first-degree misdemeanor for carrying a concealed weapon, and a third-degree felony — up to five years — for carrying a concealed firearm. And here is what the arrest reports rarely mention:

Section 790.01(4) puts that burden expressly on the State: it must prove, as elements, both that you were unlicensed and that you were ineligible under the license criteria. Officers in the field often cannot know either fact — which affects not just the charge but the legality of the stop itself. The statute even contains a hurricane-state exception: lawful gun owners may carry concealed while evacuating during the first 48 hours of a mandatory evacuation order.

Is Open Carry Legal in Florida Now?

As of late 2025, yes — for people who may lawfully possess firearms. In McDaniels v. State, No. 1D2023-0533 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept. 10, 2025), Florida’s First District held the state’s decades-old open-carry ban, section 790.053, unconstitutional under the Second Amendment: applying the U.S. Supreme Court’s Bruen test, the court found no historical tradition supporting a categorical ban, declaring that “[t]he Constitution protects the right to carry arms openly for self-defense.” The Attorney General directed that the ruling be honored statewide, and other districts have since acknowledged it. We broke the decision down in detail — including what it does not change — in our guide to Florida’s 2025 open-carry ruling.

The critical caveats: McDaniels protects ordinary, law-abiding adults. It does not restore gun rights to convicted felons or others prohibited from possession, it does not eliminate location restrictions, and it does not license waving a gun around — which brings us to the charge that has quietly become the workhorse of Tampa Bay gun prosecutions.

What Is Improper Exhibition of a Firearm?

Under section 790.10, Florida Statutes, exhibiting a firearm or other weapon “in a rude, careless, angry, or threatening manner,” in the presence of one or more persons and not in necessary self-defense, is a first-degree misdemeanor — up to a year in jail. In the permitless-carry era, this is the charge that turns a traffic dispute, a neighbor feud, or an argument in a parking lot into a criminal case: carrying the gun was legal; how it was displayed is what gets charged.

The defense terrain is favorable. “Rude, careless, angry, or threatening” is in the eye of an alarmed complainant; the statute itself excludes displays in necessary self-defense; and the line between lawful open carry, a defensive display, and improper exhibition is now genuinely unsettled after McDaniels. Where the display escalates into a charge of aggravated assault, remember what our assault guide explains: aggravated assault was removed from 10-20-Life in 2016, so the automatic firearm minimums people fear do not apply to that charge.

What Is Felon in Possession of a Firearm?

The most unforgiving gun crime in Florida. Under section 790.23, Florida Statutes, a convicted felon may not own or have in his or her “care, custody, possession, or control” any firearm, ammunition, or electric weapon — and the same ban reaches people found delinquent of felony-level acts who are under 24. It is a second-degree felony punishable by up to 15 years, and under the 10-20-Life statute, actual possession carries a 3-year mandatory minimum.

Three battlegrounds decide these cases. First, actual versus constructive possession: a gun in a shared car or house is not automatically “possessed” by the felon in the room — constructive possession requires proof of knowledge and dominion, it is hotly litigable, and the 3-year minimum attaches only to actual possession. Second, the search: these charges almost always begin with a stop or search that can be challenged. Third, the predicate: the ban does not apply if civil rights and firearm authority have been restored or the record was expunged — and whether an out-of-state disposition even qualifies as a “conviction” is a legal question worth litigating. Courts are also actively wrestling with Second Amendment challenges to felon-possession bans after Bruen; that litigation is moving, and preserving the issue can matter.

What Is Florida’s 10-20-Life Law?

Section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes imposes escalating mandatory minimums when a firearm is involved in one of its enumerated felonies:

The enumerated felonies include murder, robbery, burglary, kidnapping, aggravated battery, carjacking, home-invasion robbery, drug trafficking, and others — but not aggravated assault, which the Legislature removed in 2016. These minimums strip judges of discretion, which transfers all the power to the charging decision — and that is precisely where early defense work pays: whether the felony charged is actually a listed one, whether possession was “actual,” and whether the discharge caused the harm are all questions that decide decades.

Where Are Guns Still Prohibited?

Permitless carry and McDaniels changed who may carry and how — not where. The license statute’s list of prohibited places (schools and school events, courthouses, polling places, bars’ alcohol-service areas, and more) still applies to carriers, licensed or not, and separate statutes cover school zones and other sensitive locations. Location-based gun charges are technical, and signage, boundaries, and knowledge requirements all matter — do not assume a place restriction was valid just because a citation says so.

How Do We Defend Gun Charges?

We start with the stop. Most Tampa Bay gun cases begin with a traffic stop, a street encounter, or an anonymous tip — and after permitless carry, the sight of a firearm, without more, is a weak foundation for a detention. I taught officers this area of law at the police academy; our attorneys use that training to find the constitutional defects in how the gun was found. From there: the State’s burden to prove license ineligibility as an element; actual-versus-constructive possession in every multi-occupant case; the necessary-self-defense exclusion in exhibition cases; predicate and restoration issues in felon-possession cases; and the charging-precision fights that keep 10-20-Life minimums out of the case. Gun charges carry the harshest math in Florida sentencing — the defense has to start before the math does.

What Should You Do If You Are Arrested on a Gun Charge?

Say nothing about the gun — not whose it is, not why it was there, not that you “didn’t know it was still in the bag.” Possession cases are built on statements more often than fingerprints. Then move fast: the stop and search that produced the firearm are the foundation of the case, and the video, witnesses, and dispatch records that test them are freshest in the first weeks. If you are a prior felon, bring your complete history — including any rights restoration — to counsel immediately, because the difference between a defensible case and a 3-year minimum can be one document. Our attorneys evaluate the search first, the possession theory second, and the plea posture last.

Frequently Asked Questions About Florida Gun Crimes

Do I need a permit to carry a gun in Florida?

Not for concealed carry, since July 1, 2023 — anyone who meets the criteria to get a concealed-carry license may carry without one. Carrying while ineligible remains a crime (a third-degree felony for a concealed firearm), and the license itself still has benefits, including reciprocity in other states. Our attorneys still see arrests of eligible carriers; eligibility is an element the State must prove, and we hold it to that.

Is open carry legal in Florida?

Yes, as of the First District’s September 2025 decision in McDaniels v. State declaring the open-carry ban unconstitutional — a ruling honored statewide. It applies to people who may lawfully possess firearms, it leaves location restrictions intact, and it does not protect angry or threatening displays, which remain chargeable as improper exhibition. Our detailed guide to the ruling covers what changed and what did not.

Can a convicted felon ever have a gun again in Florida?

Only after civil rights and firearm authority are restored through clemency, or if the record was expunged under the specific statute — otherwise possession of a firearm or even ammunition is a second-degree felony. Whether a particular old disposition actually qualifies as a predicate conviction is a genuine legal question, and The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. examines it in every felon-possession case.

What is the penalty for carrying a concealed firearm without being eligible?

A third-degree felony — up to five years in prison. But the State must prove both that you were unlicensed and that you were ineligible for a license, as elements of the crime. Many arrests are made without officers knowing either fact, which creates both trial defenses and suppression issues.

Does pulling a gun trigger 10-20-Life?

Displaying a gun, without firing it, is typically charged as improper exhibition (a misdemeanor) or aggravated assault (a felony) — and aggravated assault is not on the 10-20-Life list. The 10-, 20-, and 25-to-life minimums attach when a firearm is possessed or discharged during one of the statute’s enumerated felonies, like robbery or burglary. Which charge gets filed is a decision our attorneys work to influence early.

Can gun charges be dismissed?

Regularly — gun cases rise and fall on the stop and search, and a suppressed firearm usually ends the prosecution. Possession theories fail in shared spaces, eligibility elements go unproven, and self-defense excludes exhibition charges. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. defends firearm cases throughout Tampa Bay — call (813) 727-7159 for a free, confidential review before you talk to anyone about the gun.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Hillsborough County Criminal Defense Attorney page.

Related reading: Florida’s 2025 Open-Carry Ruling: What You Need to Know · What Is Assault in Florida? · What Is Robbery in Florida? · What Is Burglary in Florida? · What to Do After Being Arrested in Tampa, Florida

Florida Gave You More Gun Rights — and Kept Every Gun Charge

If you have been arrested on a firearm charge in Hillsborough, Pinellas, or Pasco County, you are caught in the gap between a state that just expanded carry rights and prosecutors still charging every gun they find. Call the attorneys of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. — founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato — at (813) 727-7159 before you give a statement. The search that found the gun is the case; let us test it while the evidence is fresh.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

This guide covers what the state has to prove, the defenses that actually move the needle, and why the early hours and weeks of a case matter more in armed robbery than almost any other charge.

What Armed Robbery Means Under Florida Law

Robbery is defined in Florida Statute 812.13 as the taking of money or property from a person, by force, violence, assault, or putting the victim in fear, with intent to deprive them of it. The statute then layers the penalty based on what the accused was carrying.

There is a meaningful legal difference between strong-arm robbery, robbery with a weapon, and robbery with a firearm or other deadly weapon. That difference controls the maximum sentence, the mandatory minimum, and whether the case is bondable.

Moving a case down even one row on this chart can mean a 15-year swing in maximum exposure and removes the 10-20-Life floor entirely. That is what most armed robbery defense work is actually about.

The Elements the State Has to Prove

To convict for armed robbery, the prosecutor must prove every one of the following beyond a reasonable doubt:

• A taking of money or property that could be the subject of theft
• The property was taken from the person or custody of another
• Force, violence, assault, or putting in fear was used in the course of the taking
• Intent to permanently or temporarily deprive the owner of the property
• The accused carried a firearm, deadly weapon, or other weapon during the offense

If the state cannot prove any one of these elements, the charge fails or has to be reduced.

A note on what “carrying” means. The Florida Supreme Court held in State v. Baker, 452 So. 2d 927 (Fla. 1984), that the enhancement attaches to the carrying of the weapon, not the brandishing of it. The weapon does not have to be pointed at anyone. But “carry” still has limits. In State v. Burris, 875 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 2004), the court held that an automobile cannot be “carried” within the meaning of the statute. Edge cases like these are exactly the kind of pressure points a trial-tested defense attorney is looking for.

Why Armed Robbery Triggers Florida’s 10-20-Life Law

Florida Statute 775.087, known as 10-20-Life, was enacted in 1999 and remains the dominant sentencing factor in any armed robbery case involving a firearm. It strips judicial sentencing discretion from the judge.

Three things about this statute make it especially dangerous:

1. The mandatory term is in addition and consecutive to the sentence for the underlying robbery.
2. The judge has no authority to depart downward once the conviction is entered.
3. Only the State Attorney’s Office can waive the minimum. The judge cannot. The defense attorney cannot.

That last point is the entire game. Once a 10-20-Life-eligible armed robbery conviction is in place, the floor is fixed. The leverage point is at charging and at plea negotiation, before the conviction. That is why we treat the first 30 days after an arrest as the most important window of the case.

Defenses That Actually Move the Needle in Armed Robbery Cases

Not every defense is equal. In armed robbery, a handful of defenses produce most of the meaningful outcomes, whether that means dismissal, a not-guilty verdict at trial, or a charge reduction that eliminates the mandatory minimum.

Mistaken Identity and Eyewitness Misidentification

Eyewitness misidentification is the single most attackable evidence type in stranger-on-stranger robbery cases. According to the Innocence Project, more than 60% of their wrongfully convicted clients were convicted in part because of eyewitness misidentification. Earlier DNA-era data put the figure even higher, in the 71 to 75% range.

Florida has officially recognized this risk. In 2017, the legislature passed Florida Statute 92.70, which requires non-participating, blind administration of live and photo lineups. The Florida Supreme Court adopted Standard Jury Instruction 3.9(c) the following year, which directs jurors to weigh nine specific factors when evaluating eyewitness testimony, including the witness’s opportunity to observe, lapses of time, and cross-racial identification effects.

When we challenge an identification, we are usually working on three fronts at once:

• Suppression of any identification obtained through suggestive procedures (showups, single-photo displays, suggestive lineups)
• Cross-examination focused on the conditions of observation, lighting, distance, stress, weapon focus, and the gap between the event and the identification
• The 3.9(c) instruction at trial, which forces the jury to evaluate the identification through the same factors social science has shown to matter

In one armed robbery acquittal we tried, the victim had failed to mention a distinctive arm tattoo when describing the suspect to police. That single omission, paired with cross-examination on the conditions of the identification, was enough to win a not-guilty verdict. Each case is unique, and past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Alibi Defense

If the accused was not at the scene, that fact has to be developed methodically. Cell-tower records, GPS data, ride-share records, physical surveillance from third-party businesses, and corroborating witness testimony can all place a defendant somewhere other than the alleged crime location. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.200 requires advance written notice of alibi witnesses, so this defense has to be planned, not improvised.

One practical point: most security DVRs overwrite their footage in 14 to 30 days. If alibi video exists at a gas station, restaurant, parking lot, or apartment complex, it has to be preserved fast. That is one of the most concrete reasons early counsel matters in robbery cases.

Challenging the “Weapon” Element

The line between “weapon,” “deadly weapon,” and “firearm” is where many armed robbery cases shift in the defendant’s favor. The legal definitions matter.

• Firearm is defined in Florida Statute 790.001 as a weapon designed to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive, the frame or receiver of such a weapon, a silencer, a destructive device, or a machine gun.
• Weapon is defined as any dirk, knife, metallic knuckles, slungshot, billie, tear gas gun, chemical weapon, or other deadly weapon other than a firearm. A common pocketknife, plastic knife, or blunt-bladed table knife is excluded.
• Deadly weapon is a jury question. A weapon qualifies as deadly if it is used or threatened to be used in a way likely to produce death or great bodily harm.

Florida case law has carved out real defense room here:

• State v. Burris, 875 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 2004): an automobile cannot be “carried” as a deadly weapon.
• Dale v. State, 703 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 1997): whether an unloaded BB gun is a “deadly weapon” is a jury question, not a foregone conclusion.
• D.D. v. State: when the state could not prove the object was an actual firearm, the conviction was reduced from robbery with a deadly weapon to robbery with a weapon.
• Butler v. State, 602 So. 2d 1303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992): when the state could not prove the defendant actually possessed a weapon, the appellate court reversed the armed robbery conviction and directed entry of judgment for unarmed robbery.

If the alleged “firearm” was a BB gun, a replica, a toy, or an object that was never recovered, the path from a life-felony charge to a 30-year first-degree felony to a 15-year second-degree felony is open. Each step down removes layers of mandatory time.

Specific Intent Defenses and the “Afterthought” Rule

Robbery is a specific-intent crime. The state has to prove the accused intended to permanently or temporarily deprive the owner of the property at the moment force was used. If force was used for a different reason, and the taking happened only as an afterthought, the charge is theft, not robbery.

The Florida Supreme Court explained the rule in Mahn v. State, 714 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 1998), holding that where property is taken to effect escape after violence motivated by something other than theft, no robbery occurred. DeJesus v. State, 98 So. 3d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), confirms that defendants are entitled to a special “afterthought” jury instruction when the evidence supports it.

A related defense is claim of right. Florida recognizes that a forcible taking under a bona fide claim of right is not robbery if the accused had a good-faith belief that they owned the property or were entitled to immediate possession of it. This often comes up in disputes over loaned items, drug debts (which present their own complications), and personal property arguments that turn physical.

Constitutional Motions to Suppress

Many armed robbery cases are won on motion practice before they ever reach a jury. Suppressing a single piece of evidence can collapse the case.

• Fourth Amendment. Challenges to the legality of stops, searches, and seizures of clothing, firearms, vehicles, phones, and stolen property. If the firearm was found through an illegal search, it cannot be used at trial.
• Fifth Amendment. Challenges to statements made without proper Miranda warnings or under coercive interrogation conditions. The Innocence Project of Florida reports that more than 25% of wrongful convictions overturned by DNA evidence involved false confessions, admissions, or statements to law enforcement.
• Sixth Amendment. Challenges to violations of the right to counsel, including statements taken after the right attached, and Confrontation Clause challenges to surrogate or uncross-examined witness testimony under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004).

When we work an armed robbery case, motions to suppress are usually drafted in the first 60 to 90 days. Suppression of an identification, a confession, or the firearm itself can convert a life-exposure case into a dismissal or a substantially reduced plea.

Duress and Coercion

Duress is available when the accused participated under an imminent and well-grounded threat of serious harm, with no reasonable opportunity to escape. It comes up most often in cases involving co-defendants, gang involvement, or human trafficking situations. It is a narrow defense and requires careful corroboration, but in the right facts it can be decisive.

What Realistic Outcomes Look Like

It would be dishonest to write about armed robbery defense without addressing the reality of how these cases actually resolve. According to BJS case-processing data and the ABA Plea Bargain Task Force, the vast majority of felony cases in the United States resolve by guilty plea, not by trial. The ABA Task Force’s 2023 report concluded that nearly 98% of criminal convictions come from guilty pleas.

That statistic should not push anyone into accepting a plea reflexively. Trial-level preparation is what creates the leverage to negotiate something better than the 10-year mandatory floor. Vera Institute research on plea bargaining documents that a real “trial penalty” exists, with custodial sentences imposed at trial running substantially longer than sentences imposed through plea agreements. That trial penalty means trial is a real option only when the case is genuinely defensible. When it is, the defense should be ready.

Realistic outcomes in armed robbery cases generally fall into one of these categories:

• Dismissal through successful motions to suppress or motions to dismiss under Rule 3.190(c)(4), particularly when the firearm or identification is excluded
• Charge reduction to robbery with a weapon (no 10-20-Life), simple robbery, grand theft, or robbery by sudden snatching, restoring judicial sentencing discretion
• Youthful Offender sentencing under Florida Statute 958.04 for defendants under 21, capping incarceration at 4 years and the total sentence at 6 years (a critical leverage point we discuss in our overview of Youthful Offender sentencing in Florida)
• Acquittal at trial when the identification, weapon element, or specific intent is genuinely contestable
• Negotiated plea to a non-mandatory disposition when the facts cannot support reduction to a lesser charge but the defense can show pre-trial weaknesses

The Youthful Offender option is worth a special mention. If the accused was under 21 at the time of sentencing, with no prior YO designation, and the conviction is for a non-life felony (which includes robbery with a weapon but not robbery with a firearm sentenced as a life felony), Youthful Offender sentencing allows the prosecutor to waive 10-20-Life entirely. That single statutory tool has changed the trajectory of more young defendants’ lives than almost any other plea-stage move available.

Why Early Attorney Involvement Matters More in Armed Robbery Cases

In most criminal cases, hiring an attorney quickly is helpful. In armed robbery, it is decisive. Here is why.

Pre-file advocacy. Between the arrest and the State Attorney’s filing decision (typically 21 to 33 days), the prosecutor is making the single most consequential decision in the case: what to charge. A defense attorney working that window can present evidence the police did not have, raise legal issues the assigned prosecutor may not have considered, and influence whether the firearm enhancement, the deadly-weapon enhancement, or the case itself is filed.

Evidence preservation. Surveillance video at gas stations, restaurants, and apartments is overwritten in 14 to 30 days. Cell phone data has retention windows. Witnesses’ memories degrade. The first two weeks are when defense investigation is most productive.

Identification challenges. The earlier we get into a case, the more we can do to challenge a suggestive showup, demand a fair lineup procedure, or prevent a contaminated identification from hardening into the witness’s permanent recollection.

The mandatory-minimum problem. Because only the prosecutor can waive 10-20-Life, the negotiation that matters is functionally with the State Attorney’s Office, not the judge. That negotiation is most effective when defense counsel is in early enough to influence the charge before it is filed.

This is the mechanical reason the Tampa Violent Crime Lawyer page and the Tampa Gun Crimes Lawyer page on our website both emphasize 24/7 availability. The first 72 hours after an arrest are when surveillance footage is still recoverable, witnesses are still reachable, and the State Attorney’s filing decision is still in motion.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the minimum sentence for armed robbery in Florida?

If a firearm was carried during the robbery, the mandatory minimum is 10 years under Florida’s 10-20-Life law. If the firearm was discharged, the minimum is 20 years. If anyone was injured or killed, the minimum is 25 years to life. Only the prosecutor can waive these minimums.

Can a BB gun count as a firearm in Florida armed robbery cases?

Not as a firearm under Florida Statute 790.001, but it can still qualify as a “weapon” or “deadly weapon” depending on the facts. The Florida Supreme Court held in Dale v. State that whether an unloaded BB gun is a deadly weapon is a jury question. If the state cannot prove the object was an actual firearm, the charge often drops from robbery with a firearm (life felony, 10-year mandatory) to robbery with a weapon (first-degree felony, 30-year max, no mandatory).

What if I did not actually have a weapon during the alleged robbery?

If the state cannot prove possession of a weapon, the proper charge is strong-arm robbery (a second-degree felony with a 15-year maximum) or, in some fact patterns, theft. Butler v. State is the key case: the appellate court reversed an armed robbery conviction and directed entry of judgment for unarmed robbery when the state could not prove the defendant actually possessed a weapon.

Can armed robbery charges be reduced or dropped before trial?

Yes, and this is where most of the meaningful defense work happens. Successful motions to suppress (of an identification, a confession, or the firearm) can collapse the case entirely. Charge reductions to robbery with a weapon, simple robbery, or grand theft remove the 10-20-Life floor. Pre-file advocacy can sometimes prevent the firearm enhancement from being filed in the first place.

Should I talk to police if I am being investigated for armed robbery?

No. Invoke your right to remain silent and your right to counsel, and do it clearly and out loud. The Florida Innocence Commission’s data on false confessions, combined with the legal architecture of Miranda, makes this the single highest-leverage decision a person under investigation can make. There is no upside to giving a statement. Wait for an attorney.

How long does an armed robbery case take to resolve in Florida?

Felony defendants are entitled to be brought to trial within 175 days under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191. The Florida Supreme Court restructured this rule effective July 1, 2025: the speedy trial clock now starts when formal charges are filed (not at arrest), the recapture period grew from 10 days to 30 days, and recapture is now mandatory in all cases. In practice, armed robbery cases often take 9 to 18 months to resolve, longer if a trial is set.

How The Brancato Law Firm Approaches Armed Robbery Cases

We handle armed robbery cases the way we handle homicide cases: with full forensic preparation from day one. Our managing partner, Rocky Brancato, served as Chief Operations Officer of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office, where he led the largest criminal defense operation in Tampa Bay. He understands charging policies, mandatory-minimum dynamics, and the State Attorney’s filing process from the leadership level. He has tried 150+ jury trials to verdict and is death-qualified, a credential reflecting the rigorous standards required for the most serious criminal matters.

Our published armed robbery results include a not-guilty verdict on armed robbery with a firearm (two counts) where mistaken-identity defense was built around hands-on examination of the evidence and cross-examination of the investigating detectives, and a not-guilty verdict on a separate armed robbery case where we exposed the victim’s failure to mention a distinctive arm tattoo when describing the suspect. Each case is unique, and past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

We ensure every client receives thorough preparation. We provide upfront, flat-fee pricing on every case, with payment plans available. Free, confidential consultations are available 24/7 by phone.

If you or a family member has been arrested for armed robbery, robbery with a firearm, or robbery with a deadly weapon in Hillsborough, Pinellas, or Pasco County, the next 72 hours matter more than the next 72 days. Call (813) 727-7159 for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will give you a straight answer about your case, the realistic range of outcomes, and what early defense work can do to change the trajectory.

In a homicide case, prosecutors love to show the jury photographs of the defendant holding a gun. After all, such images create a powerful visual association: this person had a gun, and someone died from a gunshot. However, for such evidence to be admissible, the prosecution must establish a nexus—a connection between the gun in the photograph and the gun used in the crime.

When the guns merely look similar, that connection does not exist. Similar is not the same. In this homicide case, a firearms expert with decades of experience identified the precise model of the gun in my client’s social media photo—and proved it was not the murder weapon. As a result, we kept the prejudicial photograph out of evidence entirely.  I am Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato. This post is part of our forensic series put out by the Brancato Law Firm, P.A., your Tampa criminal forensic evidence law firm.

The Case: A Young Defendant and a Damaging Photo

My client, a young man, faced homicide charges. The state had recovered the murder weapon and placed it into evidence. They also had something else they wanted the jury to see: photographs from my client’s social media showing him holding a gun.

To a casual observer, the gun in the social media photos looked similar to the murder weapon. Both appeared to be the same general type of firearm. The prosecution intended to use these images to suggest my client had possessed a gun like the one used in the killing—creating a damaging association in the jurors’ minds.

However, when I examined the photographs closely, I noticed something important: certain features of the gun in the photo appeared different from the murder weapon. The guns were similar, but were they actually the same model? If not, the prosecution had no business showing these photos to the jury.

The Expert: A Lifetime of Firearms Knowledge

To challenge the prosecution’s evidence, I needed someone who could look at a photograph and identify the precise make and model of the firearm depicted. Fortunately, I found an expert whose qualifications were extraordinary.

This expert had grown up around firearms, handling guns since childhood. Subsequently, he built a career in law enforcement, working first for a local police department and then retiring from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). Throughout his career, he developed an encyclopedic knowledge of weapons.

Most impressively, he had toured nearly every major firearms manufacturing factory in the world. As a result, he possessed firsthand knowledge of how different manufacturers design and produce their weapons—knowledge that allowed him to identify subtle differences between similar-looking firearms that most people would never notice.

The Analysis: Identifying the Precise Model

I provided my expert with the social media photographs and access to examine the murder weapon in evidence. His task was straightforward: determine whether the gun in the photos matched the gun used in the homicide.

The expert examined the photographs carefully, focusing on specific features of the firearm: the shape of the slide, the configuration of the grip, the placement of controls, and other distinguishing characteristics. Based on these features, he identified the precise make and model of the gun my client held in the social media photos.

His conclusion was definitive: the gun in the photographs was not the same model as the murder weapon.

Although both firearms appeared similar at first glance, they were manufactured by different companies or represented different product lines. The distinguishing features that the expert identified made clear that my client’s social media photos depicted an entirely different weapon than the one used in the killing.

What Firearms Experts Look For When Identifying Weapons

The Legal Argument: No Nexus, No Admission

Armed with the expert’s findings, I filed a motion to exclude the social media photographs. The argument was straightforward: without a nexus between the gun in the photos and the murder weapon, the photographs lacked relevance to the charged offense.

Moreover, the prejudicial effect of the photographs far outweighed any probative value. Showing the jury images of a young defendant holding a gun—when that gun had nothing to do with the crime—would serve only to inflame the jury and create an unfair association in their minds.

The expert’s identification of the precise firearm model made this argument airtight. Because he could demonstrate that the social media gun was definitively not the murder weapon, the prosecution could not establish the required nexus.

Why Excluding This Evidence Mattered

The exclusion of the social media photographs removed a powerful piece of visual evidence from the prosecution’s case. Without those images, the jury could not form the mental association the state wanted: seeing the defendant with a gun and connecting him to the shooting.

Consequently, the jury had to evaluate the remaining evidence on its own merits. While they convicted my client of a lesser offense, they acquitted him of the homicide charge—a significant difference in terms of potential punishment and consequences.

This outcome demonstrates the importance of challenging every piece of evidence the prosecution intends to use. Evidence that appears damaging at first glance may not withstand expert scrutiny.

What This Case Teaches About Firearms Evidence

• First, similar does not mean same. Two firearms may look alike to untrained observers but represent completely different makes and models. An expert can identify the differences.
• Second, the prosecution must establish a nexus. For evidence to be admissible, it must connect to the charged offense. A photograph of the defendant with a different gun lacks that connection.
• Third, expert qualifications matter enormously. An expert who has toured firearms factories worldwide and spent a career handling weapons brings credibility that generalists cannot match.
• Fourth, challenge prejudicial evidence aggressively. Photographs of defendants with weapons create powerful negative associations. If the evidence lacks relevance, fight to keep it out.
• Finally, social media evidence requires scrutiny. Prosecutors increasingly use social media photographs against defendants. However, such evidence must still meet admissibility standards.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can prosecutors use social media photos against me?

Prosecutors can attempt to use social media photographs, but such evidence must meet admissibility requirements. Specifically, the photos must be relevant to the charged offense, and the prosecution must authenticate them. Additionally, if a photo’s prejudicial effect outweighs its probative value, the defense can move to exclude it.

What does nexus mean in evidence law?

Nexus refers to the connection between a piece of evidence and the facts at issue in a case. For evidence to be relevant and admissible, it must have a logical connection to something the prosecution needs to prove. Without that connection, the evidence lacks relevance.

What does a firearms expert do?

A firearms expert identifies weapons, analyzes ballistic evidence, and provides expert testimony about firearms-related issues. They can determine whether a specific weapon fired particular ammunition, identify the make and model of firearms from photographs, and explain technical aspects of weapons to judges and juries.

How can an expert identify a gun from a photograph?

Experienced firearms experts recognize distinguishing features that identify specific makes and models: slide shapes, grip configurations, control placements, trigger guard designs, and sight configurations. By analyzing these visible features, an expert can often determine the precise firearm depicted—even from a photograph.

What makes firearms evidence prejudicial?

Photographs of defendants holding weapons create powerful negative impressions on juries. Even when the pictured weapon has no connection to the charged crime, such images can make defendants appear dangerous or violent. Consequently, courts may exclude such evidence when its prejudicial effect substantially outweighs any probative value.

Should I delete gun photos from my social media?

If you face criminal charges, do not delete anything from social media without consulting your attorney first. Deleting evidence after charges can constitute obstruction of justice or spoliation of evidence. Instead, discuss your social media presence with your attorney, who can advise you on the best course of action.

Facing Gun-Related Charges?

Prosecutors use every piece of evidence they can find—including social media photographs that may have nothing to do with the charged offense. However, such evidence must meet legal standards for relevance and admissibility.

For over 25 years, I have defended clients against serious charges throughout Tampa Bay. As a result, I know how to challenge firearms evidence, retain qualified experts who can identify weapons and break the prosecution’s nexus arguments, and fight to exclude prejudicial photographs from trial.

Call (813) 727-7159 for a Confidential Consultation

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.

620 E Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602

Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

Part of the Forensic Evidence Series

Related Case Studies: DNA Evidence Defense | Aggravated Child Abuse Defense | Forensic Pathologist | Fingerprint Evidence is Not as Reliable as You Think | Cell Phone Location Data Can prove You Were Not There | When Brain Damage Explains Criminal Conduct | Your BAC at the Station is Not Your BAC Behind the Wheel | When Police Destroy Evidence They Do Not Get the Benefit of the Doubt | When a Confession is Not a Confession | When the Car–Not the Driver–Caused the Crash | The Injuries Were Real–But They Were Not From the Alleged Rape

Related Pages

Tampa Murder Attorney

Tampa Gun Crimes Attorney

Social Media Evidence in Tampa Criminal Cases

Why Expert Witnesses are Not Optional in Major Crimes Case